A Guinea Pig for Chemistry

Even behind-the-scenes writers and not-so-fortunate fortunetellers need a break every now and then.

All afternoon, I sat in a chair at the Salon Professional Academy while a friend, Tammie, coloured and cut my hair, changing me from a white-haired guy to a ginger-haired professorial type.

Thanks, Tammie, and to your colleagues, for the fun, friendship and new hairstyle.

Now, back to the story you know will keep you in your seats…

= = =

Thanks to MailPro; Richard, Ray and Julie at Lowe’s; USPS; B&N; Jonathan at Anaheim Chili.

Congrats to the NY Giants.

To think, Old MacDonald Had a Farm, GI, GI Joe

The 1% of 1%, we don’t see the world in geographic political boundaries.

Of course, as you know, we pretend the boundaries exist, telling you stuff like “Look out for that country over there — it’s against us this year,” and “Our strategic partnership with these countries is the only thing keeping your economic livelihood stable.”

Now that more than 50% of our species lives in sub/urban areas, “free” of the bind to land-based [subsistence] living, you are all our virtual slaves, depending on our virtual chess game results to tell you what to do next.

Two steps forward, one step to the left/right, please.

And then, as previous chapters have told you, there is the Committee, which also manages the lives of the 1% of the 1%.

Finally, there is the universe itself, spinning off little eddies of atoms and molecules that collect and replicate their patterns.

You should have in your thought patterns by now the full understanding that the universe as we know it is simply revealed by a 360-degree searchlight from the point of our planet/solar system, reaching a finite boundary and creating the illusion of a symmetrical sphere in which we are the center.

Feel free to comprehend our ignorance, vast as it is and will continue to be, ad infinitum.

There is just so much that I, the individual, can bother to talk about here while supervising the construction of the interwebs of interwebs tying you to your personal supercomputers tied to everyone else’s supercomputers tied, as if all of that is a single node, to the Internet of the Next Big Things to Come.

So, to me, all military actions, no matter how we label them in nationalistic or terror group or lone wolf terms, are all one.

For instance, I don’t see an Iranian nuclear scientist killed by the CIA or Mossad.  I see us managing to control ourselves by killing ourselves.

Same for sports and other categories of diverting ourselves from our primary tasks of eating and breathing.

Let us move on to more important matters.

Details in the next chapter of the story of our lives seen from the vantage point of 1000 years from now.

Happiness and humour — share them endlessly.

Pitting One’s Patience Against Potent Pettable Patents

So, tonight, to set the drama in real life here in smalltown America, where inventions and patents live or die on dreams, while viewing the episode “Copper and Robbers” on “Invention USA” of the History Channel,

Friday night 12/23, at 9pm Central:   http://www.history.com/shows/invention-usa/episodes#slide-1

consider this as a subplot you can’t clearly see but can imagine happens all across the world every day while one party reviews the actions of the other party in determining the validity of one’s rights to assert one’s ascent into the echelons of commercial success:

All,
The following emails were sent to provide basic, common law legal protection of U.S. Patent No. 8,081,074, in case the upcoming episode of “Invention USA” includes information that infringes upon the patent.
Any formal legal protective measures should be sought by a lawyer, if needed, after the episode airs.
BTW, here is A+E Television Networks’ copyright policy: http://www.aetn.com/DMCA/
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Copyright Policy – DMCA NotificationDate: Thu, December 22, 2011 2:00 pm
TO:

Darci Bailey
DMCA Agent
A&E Television Networks, LLC
235 E. 45th Street
New York, NY 10017
Phone: (212) 210-1400
Facsimile: (212) 210-1308
Email: copyright@aetn.com with the subject line “Copyright Policy – DMCA Notification”
As noted in the email below, this is a pre-notification that an upcoming episode of “Invention USA”: “Copper and Robbers,” due to premiere tomorrow, 23rd December 2011, at 10 p.m. (9 p.m. Central), may contain information from a person or persons on the show that infringes upon U.S. Patent No. 8,081,074.
The inventors of the above patent plan to review the show for alleged copyright and/or patent infringement.
If copyright infringement, patent infringement and/or deleterious remarks about the patent and/or its technology, including applicable products and/or services, appear to have been made during the broadcast of the show, the inventors will determine legal actions to take to protect their patent and its market value, both potential and actual, including “cease and desist” submittal to prevent the distribution of current/future availability on A+E Network websites and/or electronic/print media (such as single DVD(s), boxed DVD set(s), advertising media, and/or “teaser” trailers) of the episode titled “Copper and Robbers” of the show “Invention USA.”
If no copyright infringement, patent infringement, libel, slander, and/or product/service viability damage (such as might occur by general viewing of the episode by a potential manufacturer, distributor, customer and/or end user) has been observed during the broadcast or subsequent viewing by legal experts of the episode, then no further action (i.e., no formal notification of alleged copyright/patent infringement) will occur at this time.
Sincerely,
Rick Hill
261 Mohawk Road
Big Cove, AL 35763
(256) 518-9392
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Upcoming episode of “Invention USA”: “Copper and Robbers”
From:
Date: Wed, December 21, 2011 11:20 pm
To: permissions@aetvn.com

 To Whom It May Concern:
In an upcoming episode of Invention USA to premiere on the History Channel on the 23rd of December 2011, there is supposed to be a segment where “Reichart and Garrett test the mettle of an inventor who believes he’s created a way to stop a crime that costs Americans millions of dollars a year.”
For your information, U.S. patent no. 8,081,074 was officially issued yesterday that provides similar protection:
“An apparatus for deterring removal of electrical wiring that is installed in a building includes a controller, and a wiring module responsive to the controller and forming a monitored circuit with installed electrical wiring by coupling to an end of the wiring located at a load distribution junction. The other end of the wiring is electrically coupled, and can be coupled with a controlled impedance, or with a protected asset. The apparatus is configured with control logic to issue an alert if the integrity of the monitored circuit has been compromised.”
Any and all claims made on the Invention USA episode titled “Copper and Robbers” will be reviewed for patent infringement, as well as libel, slander or miscellaneous disparaging remarks in relation to the technology and inventors/businesses involved in the creation, sale and/or distribution of products/services based on the above patent.
I request permission to create a digital copy of this episode for further legal review as required or requested by the inventors of the patent cited above to protect the patent’s technological and market value.

Book ’em in the library

Reading about the tragic loss of lives in protests around the world saddens me.

Reading about the tragic loss of writings in Egypt makes me angry.

Reminds me of the following passage on p. 194 of the paperback edition of “The Man Who Loved Books Too Much”:

In callously stealing, mutilating, and destroying rare and unique elements of our common intellectual heritage, Spiegelman did not simply aim to divest Columbia of $1.3 million worth of physical property.  He risked stunting, and probably stunted, the growth of human knowledge to the detriment of us all.  By the very nature of the crime, it is impossible to know exactly what damage he has done.  But this much is clear: this crime was quite different from the theft of cash equal to the appraised value of the material stolen, because it deprived not only Columbia, but the world, of irreplaceable pieces of the past and the benefits of future scholarship.

We cannot replace people entirely and, yes, we can make copies of the records people leave behind, including writing, works of art, etc., but we cannot replace the unique combination of waveform interaction in the original editions when people were living in the moment.

Someone told me that members of the U.S. Congress are hard-working.  I think the person intended to say hard-headed but is too polite in conversations about politicians in general.

When the Russians are complaining about Chinese manufacturing quality, you know it’s real (translation from Izvestiya):

December 21, 2011, 21:07 | Army | Denis Thalmann, Veronica Fomicheva

Военных хотят защитить от китайской формы Want to protect the military from the Chinese form

Чиновники пытаются запретить производство российского камуфляжа из заграничной ткани Officials are trying to ban the production of Russian camouflage of foreign tissue

 

Фото: Екатерина Штукина Photo: Catherine Shtukin

Минпромторг совместно с Минэкономразвития планирует ограничить использование для пошива военной формы тканей зарубежного производства, в том числе китайской, сообщил источник в военном ведомстве. Ministry of Industry jointly with the Ministry plans to limit the use of sewing uniforms for foreign-made textiles, including China, a source in the Defense Ministry. Сейчас около 50% гимнастерок и бушлатов шьются из дешевой китайской ткани, при этом 20% из них не отвечают требованиям ГОСТа. Now about 50% of tunics and jackets are made of cheap Chinese cloth, with 20% of them do not meet the requirements of GOST. Военные говорят, что не могут контролировать закупки своих поставщиков. The military say they have no control over the purchase of their suppliers.

— Мы можем при объявлении тендера объявить требования к качеству ткани — – We can announce at the tender requirements for quality fabrics –
составу, типу плетения, физическим свойствам, — но не можем указывать, у composition, type of weave, physical properties, – but we can not specify a
кого именно они должны эти ткани покупать, 30-й федеральный закон нам это запрещает, — рассказали «Известиям» в Минобороны. whom they should buy these fabrics, the 30th is a federal law prohibits us – told “Izvestia” the Defense Ministry.

Собеседник пояснил, что военным неважно, из ткани какого производителя сшита форма, главное, чтобы она соответствовала предъявленным требованиям. The interviewee explained that the military does not matter what manufacturer of fabric sewn form, more importantly, to match your requirements. Для проверки этого соответствия каждая партия формы проходит экспертизу и выбраковку. To check this correspondence, each party is a form examination and culling.

— По моим данным, случаев поступления в войска формы из некачественной – According to my information, admissions in the form of low-quality troops
ткани не зафиксировано, — утверждает информированный офицер. tissue is not fixed, – says the officer informed.

Как рассказал коммерческий директор ООО «БМК-Текстиль» Максим Ильин, производителю, который выиграл тендер, сейчас ничто не мешает одну партию формы выпустить из российской ткани, а остальные — пошить из азиатской. As Commercial Director said, “BMC-Textiles” Maxim Ilin, the manufacturer, which won the tender, now nothing to prevent one party from the Russian form of release of tissue, and the rest – from Asian to sew.

— Погонный метр отечественной ткани стоит 140 рублей, китайской — 90. – Running meter national fabric is 140 rubles, China – 90. На одну летнюю форму уходит примерно 4 м полотна. At one year form takes about 4 m leaf. При заказе, скажем, в 50 тыс. комплектов только на разнице в тканях фабрика сэкономит до 10 млн рублей, — подсчитывает Ильин. When ordering, say, 50 thousand sets only on the difference in the tissues of the factory will save up to 10 million rubles – calculates Ilyin.

Но за дешевизну приходится платить качеством. But for cheapness has to pay quality. Китайская ткань почти целиком состоит из полиэфира — материала, который делают из пластиковых отходов — бутылок, тарелок и пакетов. Chinese fabric consists almost entirely of polyester – a material which is made from plastic waste – bottles, trays and bags. И, в отличие от качественных тканей, не содержит хлопка или вискозы. And, unlike quality fabrics, not cotton or viscose contains. А российские ткачи вынуждены соблюдать ГОСТы. A Russian weavers are forced to comply with state standards.

— Профессиональные производители называют китайские ткани «стеклом». – Professional manufacturers of Chinese fabrics called “glass”. Тело Body
в ней совершенно не дышит. it absolutely was not breathing. Военные в такой форме рискуют получить кожные и аллергические болезни, — говорит Максим Ильин. The military in such form and at risk of skin allergies, – said Maxim Ilin.

Ни в одной из опрошенных «Известиями» компаний, выигравших тендеры Минобороны на форму, не согласились обсуждать страну происхождения тканей, из которых шьют форму. None of the respondents “Izvestia” of companies that won tenders to form the Ministry of Defense, did not agree to discuss the country of origin of fabrics sewn form.

Только на одном комбинате, которой выполняет заказ военных, на условиях анонимности рассказали, что раньше закупали ткани в Китае, а сейчас не рискуют из-за отсутствия гарантии качества. Only one plant, which serves military order, on condition of anonymity said they had bought the fabric in China, and now not at risk because of a lack of quality assurance.

— У зарубежных поставщиков нет никаких обязательств перед Минобороны, они – In foreign suppliers do not have any obligations to the Ministry of Defense, they
не обеспечивают мобилизационный резерв страны, поэтому вполне могут вместо not provide a mobilization reserve of the country, so it may instead
одного типа ткани поставить другой. one type of fabric to put on the other. А мы ведь не можем проверять качество каждого рулона — шьем из того, что привезли со склада. But we have not been able to check the quality of each roll – sew from the fact that they brought from the warehouse. А иногда различия на глаз не видны — с виду ткани одинаковы. And sometimes the differences are not visible to the eye – with the same tissue type. Поэтому от греха подальше мы не связываемся с китайцами — шьем из российских тканей. Therefore, away from sin we do not associate with the Chinese – sew a Russian tissues. Тем более цены сейчас почти не различаются, — рассказал «Известиям» представитель пошивочного предприятия. Especially since the prices are almost no different – told “Izvestia” the representative of the sewing business.

По его словам, если военная приемка выявит несоответствие использованных тканей техзаданию, указанному во время тендера, швейный комбинат заносится в «черный список» и исключается из борьбы за госзаказ. According to him, if the military inspection will reveal inconsistency of used tissues terms of reference specified in the tender, a sewing factory entered in the “black list” and is excluded from the struggle for state orders.

— В лаборатории некачественную ткань вычислить очень легко — она по-другому – In the laboratory, low-quality fabric is easy to calculate – it differently
реагирует на растворители, иначе горит. reacts to solvents, or burning. Соответственно, выявить форму из Accordingly, to identify the form of
некачественных тканей очень просто. defective tissue is very simple. Но раз такая форма в армию попадает, военные, видимо, не очень тщательно проверяют, — отметил представитель швейного комбината. But once this form goes to the army, military, apparently, not very carefully checked, – the representative of the sewing factory.

Он отметил, что пока в России не будут введены прямые ограничения на использование импортных тканей, производители будут неизбежно выбирать те, что подешевле. He noted that while in Russia will not put direct restrictions on the use of imported fabrics, manufacturers will inevitably choose those that are cheaper.

Директор компании «Чайковский текстиль» Евгений Титов рассказал, что кроме химического состава российские ткани превосходят китайские в первую очередь качеством плетения и химической обработки. Director of “Tchaikovsky Textile” Titov said that besides the chemical composition of tissue superior Russian, Chinese in the first place the quality of weaving and chemical processing.

— Себестоимость тканей одинакового качества в России и в Китае примерно одинакова, тем более с учетом транспортных и таможенных расходов. – The cost of the same quality fabrics in Russia and in China about the same, especially in view of transport and customs costs. Поэтому если цена на китайскую ткань ниже в два раза, то, значит, там занижено качество, по-другому не бывает, — отметил Титов. Therefore, if the price of Chinese fabric below two times, it means that there is too low quality, in other words it is not – said Titov.

Согласно проекту постановления правительства, разработанному в Минпромторге и Минэкономразвития, камвольные ткани, используемые для изготовления вещевого имущества, должны будут иметь российское происхождение. According to the draft government decision, developed in Minpromtorge and Economic Development, worsted fabric used to make clothing and equipment will have to be of Russian origin. Сейчас проект находится на согласовании в правительстве. Now the project is being coordinated by the government.

При этом, по данным «Известий», происхождение ниток, из которых будут ткать полотна в России, в документе не регламентировано, а значит, запретить ткацким фабрикам использовать китайские нитки в производстве российских тканей не сможет никто. In this case, according to “Izvestiya”, the origin of thread, of which will weave fabric in Russia, the document is not regulated and, therefore, to prohibit use of Chinese textile factory in the production of yarn fabrics Russian nobody can.

Support your local designer

Through a pledge at Kickstarter, I supported LunaTik Touch Pen: The Evolution of the Stylus and the designer, Scott Wilson:

The MNML Collection. 1 LunaTik Alloy Touch Pen with silver anodized aluminum body and graphite metal clip. 1 LunaTik Plastic Touch Pen Arctic White and 1 LunaTik Plastic Touch Pen Pitch Black. US shipping included. Add $20 for international shipping.

Meanwhile, you could be the next great app developer.  Yes, YOU!

LiFePo4

Thinking about Maslow’s hierarchy of needs today, comparing individualistic versus collectivist societies.

And then, remembering the kid on the playground who ended the game by saying, “It’s my ball and I’m going home,” while reading about the U.S. and Iran trading words over a no-longer flying electronic gizmo called a drone.

Will Brazil clear the Amazon rain forest in my lifetime?

Will governments shrink as retirement/pension plans are taken away from workers, thus decreasing the desire of people to get quasi-guaranteed-for-life government jobs?  How will decreased tax revenues (a/k/a redistribution of wealth) change sociopolitical behaviour in the longterm?  Is there a destabilising effect by fewer government bonds being issued?

Should the leaders of MF Global be hung by their short and curlies as a lesson to everyone else who says, “Well, sure, I was the head of the company — ‘the buck stops here’ and all that — but I’m just there as a leech to earn a big salary, using my face recognition as a selling point.  I have no idea what I’m doing and certainly don’t know what’s going on in the company.  I use coded words and phrases all the time — management doublespeak — how am I supposed to know which code words or phrases are actually interpreted and implemented by my employees?”?

Is there a tipping point in biodiversity for our species?  Do we really want to find out?

What is the economic impact of Burt Rutan’s new venture?

Insects fly past the window.

A solar cell charges a battery on the front deck.

How many times have you gone out on a date with someone you met via an e-dating site and the date tells you, after meeting you in person, “Oh, well, I’m really serious about someone else”?  We use coded words and phrases all the time.  It’s up to us to figure out how to change our tactics/behaviour to hear different words and phrases the next time.  Remember, insanity is hearing the same thing over and over and expecting to hear something different even though you haven’t changed.

Thanks to Garrett, Linda, Tiffany and Heath at Cracker Barrel; Batteries Plus; Sophie’s link to a Simple Guide to Having Fun; those who don’t use mobile phones, the Internet or electronic social networks.

Time to have fun away from the computer-connected global subcultural meme set.  I assume the freedom of the Internet will be here when I get back.

Oh, and hey, be careful out there when buying Chinese real estate — the price of nest eggs in China DOES have an effect on you right now.  Somehow, I feel like I’m repeating myself, repeating myself, myself, myself, self, my, oh my…

Seven Billion People and Countless Other Beings to Talk About

What is Julia the Thanksgiving Girl or Jenn the rocket propulsion specialist doing right now?

What about John in the checkout line or Michelle in the deli at Publix?

Terrence or Mildred of Comcast, what does either one do on the weekend?

Or KK at Carson’s Grille?

Imagine a small fleet of crafts heading toward a distant habitable planet, sending and receiving reports along the journey, landing 1,000 years from now, funded by private individuals and companies on Earth that no longer exist in 3011.

What if government as we know it anywhere on Earth right now is no longer tenable in the near or distant future?

Would you trust the backers of a privately-funded, online voting or vote-matching system?

Shouldn’t our new system of cooperating with one another (what we commonly call politics or government) be more, not less, transparent?

Many business people are used to meeting in private, negotiating and signing nondisclosure agreements or other documents that prevent the average person on the street from seeing the details of average business transactions.

We call it competition, trade secrets, intellectual property and similar terms that ensure protection of privacy.

Government is that odd amalgam of public and private interfaces, where sole-source contracts and competing bids go up against marketing and advertisement campaigns.

If two ideas are competing against one another for limited resources, which of the ideas’ weak points or strengths is more important than the other’s?

I can talk about free, live, open source software (FLOSS) because there’s enough profitmaking available and excess resources for such a concept in small to medium markets.

What about on a global scale?

After all, a gaboodle of mobile phones contain Android, which contains a core, or kernel, of Linux code.

In our newly-connected global economy, which operates by and large as a supergossip network, where much of what we say to each other is superfluous but informational, we have created a citizenry that lives and loves outside the bounds of geographically-based political entities.

[Cue several paragraphs of historical comparisons to previous interconnected civilisations]

Are you interested in the status quo — government as it is and has been — or something new, something that develops from grassroot efforts, where we seamlessly become part of the Internet of Things, and transparency is commonplace but there’s room to respect the needs of profitmaking and intellectual/personal property rights?

I grew up playing board games called “Monopoly,” “Risk,” “Life,” and other cultural teaching tools centered on competition.  I didn’t play boards games that directly taught cooperation.  Instead, collusion of players ganging up on another was the indirect lesson I learned when one player was dominating and the others didn’t want that player to win.

It was in team sports and partner-based card games that I learned to cooperate with others in order to win against a respected opponent.

What are we teaching each other and our children about the future?