from many friends who’re passing this viral image along online…
Tag Archives: mass media
Laserline News
In a shock that has reverberated across all socioeconomic classes in Canada, word spread that the Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, often tagged the “Anti-Environmentalist” and the “Pipeline Piper of Oilands,” has been caught in a personal relationship with a moose.
When reached for comment, Harper’s spokesperson adamantly denied the prime minister would interact with anything remotely resembling nature.
Over the past two days, Clath Colkarch, a famous moose whisperer, has spent time with me to translate some of what the moose has finally decided to confess.
LN: So, Clath, tell us more.
CC: Is your name really LN?
LN: No, but our publication refuses to let journalists use their real names or initials for posted interviews. The editors feel, and are backed up by the publisher, that putting the journalist into the picture distracts from the main event.
CC: Oh, well, then, what do you want to know?
LN: How do you first discover this relationship?
CC: Well, “LN,” I was working with the US branch of the IMWAUVAAA — that’s the International Moose Whisperers Association of Unemployed Veterinarian Assistants’ Associates, Amalgamated — which, when pronounced correctly, sounds like the call of the Albertan Pinstriped Moose.
As you may have heard, the heavy snows in the north this year have caused quite a few moose to go starving. Well, I tagged along with a group of Fellows who wanted to feed moose that were in the public eye…you know, to build a lot of goodwill. But mainly, they were wanting to find moose who weren’t too emaciated but were on the edge of death so they could put them out of their misery and take the meat back home.
In this economy, even the Fellows, life members of the Fellowship of Professed, Confirmed Fellows of the Vegan Dinner Table are resorting to eating meat, preferably from the carcass of a beast that has died naturally.
Well, we was hunting…I mean, we was assisting moose in weather-related recovery efforts not far from the PM’s place in Calgary when I felt a presence.
LN: A presence? Do you mean something spiritual?
CC: Oh no. There was definitely a large female moose stepping my right foot. It felt quite painful, that presence.
LN: I suppose as a moose whisperer you must experience these kinds of feelings often, this close presence with moose?
CC: Not really. The job of a moose whisperer is actually quite lonely. Ain’t much call for moose whispering. But it’s a duty I’ve sworn to uphold, at least until my wife gets tired of me sleeping late at home, when I’m home, that is, and not wandering the woods to shirk my household maintenance chores.
LN: I see. Let’s return to the story. Was this female moose the one in question?
CC: No. She was a beauty, though. Had my eye on her for quite some time so I was pleased she made the first move. I can tell you most female moose expect the male to be aggressive but I ain’t like that.
LN: Uh-huh. Before you continue, let me remind you this is a family-oriented publication and we may choose to edit out any questionable content.
CC: Oh, no problem. Wasn’t like the lady and I took our relationship much further than a few nudges and feet stomping. Besides, she was the one who told me about Harper’s mistress.
LN: Go on.
CC: I introduced the lady to the Fellows…
LN: Does the lady moose have a name?
CC: Yes, but she prefers to remain anonymous.
LN: Anony-moose, did you say?
CC: Ha-ha. That’s a good one. Well, the Fellows, they got one look at her, how healthy she was, and wanted to know if there were any more like her around. She being the trusting beast that she is, she led us to a harem out behind Harper’s country estate. Hidden, it was, in plain sight.
LN: Our readers will certainly be interested in that revealing tidbit.
CC: As soon as I walked up to the lady’s friends, they started talking to me the way moose do, knowing me and hearing about my reputation ahead of time, mostly.
LN: I bet you heard some good tales.
CC: Actually, the tails don’t talk. It’s from the mouth and from body language where I carry on the conversation.
LN: Yes, good point. About Harper’s mistress?
CC: Oh, she was shy to begin with. She was afraid she’d be ostracised by our species if the word got out. I explained to her that I’d keep her secret as long as she wanted. After feeding her a few snack treats that my wife has perfected for just these tender moments, the moose just opened up and told me everything. Everything!
LN: I bet you were shocked.
CC: It’s not every day that you get to hear all the gossip that a harem of locked-up moose has been sharing and re-sharing until they’re about to burst.
LN: I’m sure the readers would like to hear one or two tales…err, I mean stories the moose told you.
CC: Apparently Harper, tired of moose, has been eying a panda.
LN: You don’t say.
CC: Yeah, and he’s willing to risk his relationship with the United States to get his hands on a panda. The moose say that Harper and his wife want to make a threesome this time.
LN: A threesome? Now THAT is news! Anything else?
CC: The lead moose in the harem, Harper’s main squeeze, so to speak, says that rolling in the hay with Harper is not as great as you’d think it would be. All Harper wants to do is talk about which politician he has it in for next. Takes away from the romantic mood.
Harper’s mistress says that she misses the days of the strong, silent types that most male moose have become, even though at the time she thought she wanted more conversation and less competition amongst the guys about who has the largest set of antlers. Now that she has a male who’s more conversation than antler, it’s less thrilling.
Besides, she fears he’s left her for a panda. And that’s about as low an insult as a moose can take. I’m afraid she’s going to try to starve herself to death to get down to the size of a panda. I tried explaining to her that pandas are big-bellied and never shave but she won’t listen. She just repeats the height and weight comparison between female moose and female pandas.
I think the straw that broke the back on this one was when the mistress overheard Harper referring to her at “that cow” on a mobile phone. At that point, she lost it and put the word out to find me.
LN: Thrilling! Absolutely thrilling! Now, one more question. I know your reputation is gold but do you have any solid evidence that backs up what this ‘mistress’ of Harper’s has told you?
CC: Of course. We set up several webcams.
LN: Webcams? That’s marvelous.
CC: But the video is rather explicit. We have images of Harper brushing his mistress’ coat, feeding her by hand, and…
LN: Is that it?
CC: You did say this was a family publication, didn’t you?
LN: Yes.
CC: Well, the rest of the video has been edited for your readers. If you want more, you’ll have to buy a copy of “Moose on the Loose: the untold story of Stephen Harper and his harem of ‘female cows,'” available for sale next week.
LN: I know our readers are anxiously awaiting the release of that book.
CC: The profit from the book goes to repatriating Harper’s harem to their natural surroundings.
LN: Great idea. Thank you, Clath, for taking the time to talk with us.
CC: My pleasure. Is my mike still on? No? Good, ’cause I’ve got a case of itches from these moose fleas that’d make a bear cry.
LN: Next week, we interview Chun Li, world-famous panda whisperer, about allegations of a ménage à trois taking place at the highest rank of political office here in Canada.
Until next time, keep those rumours pouring in and we’ll investigate the ones that increase our readership the most, which, in turn, make me a very rich person who wouldn’t dare consort with any of you readers unless you, too, ride in limousines and take baths in champagne.
Check our website for videos of today’s interview as well as in-depth analysis of the shocking sight of Harper intimately interacting with his moose mistress!
A Confession To Make
I have a confession to make.
For several months now, my wife and I have been listening to the Harry Potter book series on audio CD while we’ve ridden together in my wife’s Toyota Camry.
Tonight, we finished the last CD of the last book, coincidentally in the first full week of release of a film starring Daniel Radcliffe.
No more ‘arry Potter voice impersonations by Jim Dale, a great reader and probably the best parent a kid could have read a book at bedtime.
Now I can get back to writing the life of seven billion without having a mental comparison of my writing against that of the children’s book author, J.K. Rowling.
Of course, my wife and I will ride in unusual silence when together in her car.
Time to return to the story where my contacts around the world feed me their autobiographical snippets that often involve us common folk and sometimes the lives of those who claim to be our leaders.
Together, we can tell it like it really is, no matter how messy, uninspiring or truly coincidental, and not how others would have us rewrite the narrative of our lives into so-called biographical/purposeful history.
All while leaving space for us to have hope and plan for a better future.
My job here’s not to be popular or well-liked.
In fact, it’s not a job at all.
It’s who I am.
Who I say I’m meant to be.
Just like the other seven billion of us, eh?
BTW, I went to the doctor’s office earlier this week to see about a viral infection called bronchitis and was prescribed an antibiotic. If nothing else, I guess I’m “curing” my GI tract.
Will the real news anchor please step forward?
Hey, why should microbloggers use their real names if national TV broadcasters don’t?
Ask Lana del ray, lana del sol, lana del rey, manta ray, or whatever a singer’s sugar daddy’s publicist’s agent calls her these days.
BTW, our inside sources at the Vatican say that, after watching the Super Bowl, they have removed the singer commonly known as Madonna from their Public Enemy No. 1 list and replaced her with certain members of the U.S. Presidential Administration who, unfortunately, the Vatican cannot secretly have hoped were aborted by their mothers long ago.
After their great tickertape parade through the leaning towers of heroes in Manhattan, the NY Giants held a quiet buffet dinner to give out post-season awards. This year, the newest one, the Welker Award, was handed to the receiver who did the worst job faking a dropped pass in a crucial situation. We aren’t allowed to divulge the winner, however, due to concerns the Patriots may try to hire that player in the offseason.
While on the subject, a special edition candy bar will hit the stores soon. Nestlé has announced that the jersey numbers of the Patriots’ Hernandez and Welker will adorn the end of Butterfinger candy bars. Buy ’em quickly — only a limited run has hit the streets!
Merkozy Spotted Campaigning in French Countryside
Interesting news article title of the day
Data points for the day
- Two for one: data vs. data
- Who’s your champion?
- Should supermodel sex appeal be used to sell space travel …to the general public, that is?
- One astronaut — the only American female to serve aboard Mir — says goodbye
If you hadn’t see the preview yet…
Steve Harvey and Pat Sajak recently traded places as hosts of their respective TV game shows, “Family Feud” and “Wheel of Fortune.”
After decades, Pat could finally crack sexual innuendo jokes on taped TV episodes of “Family Feud,” relieving his years of tension that made him look like an empty suit “Wheel of Fortune.”
Steve, meanwhile, wondered why he didn’t have a slim co-host like Vanna White on his show, flipping the survey answers and smiling sweetly.
Jennifer Hudson has denied her agent is in negotiations to send Hudson to join Harvey on “Family Feud.”
Sajak won’t deny he’s trying to spice up “Wheel of Fortune” to take him into his retirement years and save his sanity. His liver adamantly objects.
Picture of the day
Learning Methods
Not found in a catalogue, encyclopedia, handbook, guide or dictionary are learning methods established 1000 years from now.
We, or those of you who were alive in the early 21st century, can remember hints of the push/pull technology that enabled us to grow as one.
In your time, it was the concept of re/search, often coined as SEO or search engine optimisation, reducing the time between an entity’s desire to fill a gap in learning by maximising the profit and minimising the cost to push the desired information to the entity.
It took a while to place a value on the quality of the information by paying attention to how much the entity kept looking before feeling satisfied and moving on to other tasks.
Of course, patternmatching was used to anticipate the entity’s next desire or gap in learning and queue the information ahead of time, pushing without shoving the data into the entity’s inner circle of influence.
The corporations that thrived during this period of our species’ growth were the ones that best applied the various learning methods to entities.
First, by trial and error.
Finally, by evaluating the quality of data and the level of data retention per entity.
How, you might ask?
Well, it took quite a bit of work. We had to subliminally convince Web page designers to incorporate test questions associated with the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. Then we had to create a virtual maze that gave people the sense they were discovering new ideas on their own but were slowly being channeled toward the Web pages we wanted them to view.
As the people…entities, I mean, were answering the questions subconsciously, we determined their cognitive abilities, plus how those abilities changed over time and through the random experiences over which we had no control (in other words, our fully meshed supercomputer network, including the entities (you), had not been finished by the end of the first decade of the 21st century, and thus we could not anticipate every movement and interaction the entities and their environment made (although we did expand our algorithms that estimated the probability of future events)).
That’s why it was so important to reach critical mass with the intersection of the majority of entities in our species to an electronic social media device (mobile phones, computers, etc.).
We no longer were satisfied with the passive interface between entities and one-way devices like radios and televisions.
We needed more predictability to ensure our crowdsourced, one-species plans would move forward as easily as we hoped.
We wanted both those with cast-in-stone beliefs and those whose beliefs changed with the flowing breeze of social change.
We wanted those in opposition to one another and those who cooperated with one another without question.
All of this we needed to make Earth the birthplace of a new species destined to explore the solar system, which in turn led to new entities, outside the definition of species, exploring our galaxy.
Some of you were more closely aligned with this idea than others.
Some never knew they were contributing to the idea and they wouldn’t have cared if they knew.
Some fought, kicking and screaming, in the moment and into the future where the whole species was under control of itself.
Concepts like freedom, democracy, communism, capitalism, religion, sports, fashion, business, and technology became less and less distinguishable as they merged for the purpose of establishing a stable base from which our species jumped off Earth, forming new colonies and new rules for survival in what began as hostile environments.
Entities — sets of states of energy to us — still considered themselves individual people for many decades, reinforcing their reasoning that their beliefs, wants, wishes and desires were theirs and theirs alone, no two people exactly alike.
And that’s what we wanted them — you, me, us — to believe.
It took a long time, probably close to 100 years, before most of us saw ourselves not as individuals but as nodes in a web, the web the true “person” or superentity that was self-aware and self-consciously spreading tentacles/threads outward from the gravitational pull of Earth and its closest star.
One thousand years later, it seems that these changes were so quick and made so easily that I can hardly believe they were recorded for historical research.
To you, of course, it was a turbulent time as individuality became a quaint notion while the former method of alpha males/females leading the species gave way to crowd-based thought patterns. You often joked that you couldn’t tell if the head or the tail was wagging the dog during those years.
The few yoctoseconds I spent (and as you can guess, “I” is a construct for your reading convenience but we can get to that later) to fill a previously missing gap in a centillion-sized matrix built to compute the next 1000 years of development in this part of the outer solar system helped me write this explanation, or blog entry, of language changes needed to estimate the symbol set that will be used 1000 years from now.
I’m done now. On to the next task assigned to me, this node, decades ago.



