Gusset up the place

To be a part of the moment in which we are all a part of the moment…

To read reports written in opinionated manners that one has no interest in perpetuating, personally, but understanding that the flow of the river of life — especially the main channel — does not take into account individual water molecules electrically and/or chemically attracted to a deep pool off to the side…

Gravity a mystery and yet as obvious as a changing social form of the silent treatment, such as someone refusing to respond to emails or texts…

Accepting the fact that belief in one method of thought processing is primarily what we tend to do, who we tend to be…

A one-atom “transistor” — when we do create a subatomic version?  And what comes after that?

A poem, a short story, a nail, a truss — if all is humour to this author, except when everything is not, what is anything?

The word “supercomputer” will fade into another word after supercomputer becomes ubiquitous, commoditised, superfluous…

How many people are office workers, and of them, how many long for a viewbicle?

Are you rewriting language in your image, mashing up ideas into combined letters, words and phrases that only you can understand?

Or are you thinking more universally, writing for moments past, present and future?

While others, call them A-prime, perpetuate social constructs with which they feel most comfortable identifying themselves, I contemplate the social construct of me tied to A-prime with whom we live in our time here together and what it makes me, B-notB, if I am walking the path of the wanderer who lives inside and outside of time-based social constructs.

I am humbled that people who call themselves nonconforming individualists would want to link to me in modern online social circles but I have to be careful not to allow the part of me that is the chameleon personality to blend in with nonconforming social constructs (yes, the irony is obvious — “nonconforming” and “social” seem to contradict each other) that aren’t my own.

To compute trends that will not occur in my lifetime evokes, if not provokes, odd feelings.

To know the flow of social change is often slower than we perceive…sigh…

What of the person who thought thousands of years ago of another person walking the surface of our Moon?  And of the next person who wished to walk on the surface?  And the next one who dreamt of the method getting there?  And the one who wrote a plausible story about getting there?  The one who filmed a fantasy sequence of encounters on the surface? And finally the person who first stepped on our Moon’s surface?

Is computing the trends enough?  Do I have to experience them in the moment with everyone else to experience them in my thoughts?

And do I have to share them with you/us to make the trends happen or remain silent and let them happen without an iota of influence these words will have, spreading first into a network of nonconformers and out into the rest of our shared subcultures?

What if I hold the pebble in my hand and put it in my pocket instead of skipping it across the pond?

I once met a homeless person who said he regularly talked with God and that God had recently told him all people who declawed their animals, a desecration of God’s creatures, were doomed to hell.  I told a friend I consider a devout Christian this story and he told me that God gave us dominion over all of God’s creatures so he didn’t believe that the homeless person really had talked with God.

From the scenario, I discovered that we elevate ideas to the forefront of our thoughts to strengthen our social constructs.

The homeless person and my friend have valid points, depending on whether I believe God regularly talks to people or that God gave our species dominion over every species.

Or both.

Our subcultures are contradictory, by default.

And I, this set of states of energy, consider myself alive, which separates me from that which is not alive, whatever that means, because alive/unalive is a barrier not easily perceived in an ecosystem in which atoms mix and molecules reform constantly.

I am the Wondering Wanderer, the Wandering Wonderer, not here to convince others to align their thought patterns with mine or the trends I’ve computed.

I observe.  That’s who I am.

I see us, no matter where we are in cultural subsets, squarely in the middle of one subset or spread across many, and how we interact, which intuitively and computationally imply future moments of interaction we call trends.

Some trends I would like to see happen in my lifetime, some trends I know will happen but I wish they won’t, and some trends I hope happen regardless of the status of my set of states of energy as living or nonliving.

For instance, will a person sewing images in a gusset establish a trend of decorated gussets that spawns whole industries of underwear fashion and function?  And how will that affect international business relationships of the 2020s?

Will I return to stop referring to the words “politics” and “government,” letting them meld with the word “business,” as they should?

After all, government is just a business run on coercing, cajoling, encouraging a large group of people to jointly pay for services they want on large- and small-scale levels but wouldn’t normally pay for individually.  Kind of like business in general, n’est pas?

Giving the Mob a cut of the mining rights

In a subcommittee meeting last night, a subset of Committee members reviewed the successful tactics of Anonymous attacking online entities for social justice.

An epiphanic moment hit us (kind of like the way Angelina pushed Brad down a flight of stairs and had the bright idea to claim he slipped while saving his child)!

If we are to achieve our timely goals of space settlement, we’ve got to increase our Mob participation.

Not like they are getting poorer while siphoning off illegal profits from running offshore shell corporations involved in funny money propaganda games in the military-industrial complex business.

Note how I say “they” instead of “we.”

Gives the impression I’m not also making the same untraceable profit margins, with which I help companies like Blackwater/Xe recruit people to adopt identities, including fake passports and clever disguises, to perform antisocial quactivities that mass media readily label dangerous to the wellbeing of the average citizen that we use to drum up more Mob…sorry, I mean government business, etc.

As soon as we promised the Mob-connected members of the Committee a piece of the mining business on offworld operations, they bought right in to the whole space business, ready to secretly fund superdeals and maybe, just maybe, pull forward an important milestone some thousands of Earth days away.

We plan to change our mass media hypnotising methods in this post-post-premagic world where illusion tricks are supposedly revealed at the same time they’re fooling or exfoliating you like so many skincare products that promise to do for you what your body already does for itself/you/me.

How to be a book author in 25 years or less

[Personal notes – feel free to skip]

Having written and published several books, a few that actually made me money, I enjoy reading about the lives of  authors/novelists, what motivates them and got them started.

Take this fellow, “Americana,” for instance.

Like so many others before him, he is discovering the joy of dropping out of the rat race.

Leisure time.

How many young people, not just including trust fund babies, have fostered a luxury of life without the noise and haste of mass media?

Can you think of a book you read that talked about getting away from it all?

Isn’t this idea an odd thought, that one has gotten out of the hustle and bustle of daily living only to return to the life by proxy through writing about it?

What about those who live the life but don’t write about it?

Look around you.  Do you live amongst those who aren’t spending their time constantly connected and checking their online community?

I look at me.  Most days, the majority of conversation I have with any beings takes place between my wife and me in the mornings and evenings, the rest of the day spent sitting here or feeding/petting the cats, if I’m not taking a walk in the woods or riding a bicycle along a local river trail.

Close this notebook computer and I’m virtually cut off from the rest of the world.

Just me and my books and cats warming my lap.

In other words, happiness.

I was like the writer, Steve Tuttle, not too long ago — in meetings, on the phone, checking emails, creating/modifying spreadsheets, traveling across the globe, on a constant lookout for the latest breaking news in state-of-the-art technological advances that would enhance or greatly disrupt the business models which increased my personal wealth.

Then one day it hit me.  I was no longer working for myself.  I was working for a system of beliefs which were not my own but were given to me to accept as my own through years of primary/secondary/postsecondary education.

I was not interested in buying ever more expensive cars, eating in more luxurious restaurants or negotiating bigger and bigger deals.

I was interested in nurturing me.

But at the same time, I was interested in eliminating the expanding personality of me.

By stepping out of the need to participate in the social network of our species, I have stepped into a zone where one can observe patterns and predict trends because most of us follow a script we wrote together as a society a long time ago, are rewriting every day, in fact.

Which reminds me, how do empty-nesters feel after their lives, which were so wrapped around raising their little chickadees, suddenly end when the chicks grow wings and fly away?  Is it freedom or torture or just sheer boredom?

Just 13959 days until an event occurs that is chronicled in this blog.

Reality is only seven letters.  Which seven letters do you want to be?

As a funhouse mirror, I reflect both the good and bad in us, trying to make us think about the seeds we’re planting today for the trends we’ll follow tomorrow.

For instance, is there a possible resurgence in ultraleftwingism, followers of a group similar to the Socialist Party of old, workers who no longer feel “loved” by the corporate owners/leaders that employ them and rake in a lot more money through legislative-friendly policies that border on the exploitative?

Or, will this, solving the good business generation gap, be the new trend?

Finally, are states starting to see the light and will remove more nonviolent criminals from the prison system?

I’m willing to look backward and forward to find the trends that make my life of participating in the online community worth perpetuating.

Otherwise, the repetition of repetition gets repetitive, creating/mashing up offensive and nonoffensive jokes/observations/storylines to fend off ennui, all in the simple hope that we’ll see through the repetition and make a concentrated effort where/when our species will be the one to establish a colony of sustainable Earth-based lifeforms out of this planetary system.

It doesn’t matter to me what the people look like who inhabit the offworld colony or even if they’re totally “human” in today’s sense of the world, including cyborgs who live amongst us.  The goal is the same: hedging our bets, taking one egg out of the basket and placing it in a surrogate nest as far away from Earth as possible.

Everything else is recycling Earth’s resources over and over, no matter how much fun or interesting it may be, including this blog, the books I’ve written and the retail establishments I visit (and have visited, for which I owe a debt of gratitude to pay with mentioning them here again soon).

And if we determine that a lifeform different than us, such as a simple one-celled organism, has a higher chance of survival, especially when we’ve searched a celestial body and found no lifeform that we may endanger with ours or any other we bring, then I’m willing to “plant” that organism in hopes that it will seed the solar system.

Call me a farmer whose field is this local area of the galaxy, hoping that in the current 200-million-year window of opportunity, we can hop, skip and jump our way, in one form or another, to the next safe agricultural zone.

In the meantime, there’s the matter of dark matter to resolve, a whole field, a vast tract of land, on which we haven’t broken ground yet.

Welcome to my place in the zeitgeist

Is “Iron Sky” the future of filmmaking?  Or “Tuvalu,” instead?  Maybe Laibach’s “Predictions of Fire“?

Do you gauge the future by looking at trends of incoming recent photobucket images?

How much of the universe exists outside the Internet of things?

How many men felt their manhood threatened by the U.S. HHS Secretary’s announcement about forced payments for birth control, even if they weren’t Catholic?

Have you watched “The Mindscape of Alan Moore” or listened to Emiliana Torrini?

How many producers/agents have profited off of drug-addled performers?

How many drug-addled performers have profited off of producers/agents?

How many drug-addled producers/agents have profited off of drug-addled performers?

How many performers have profited off of drug-addled producers/agents?

How many drug-addled producers/agents have profited off of performers?

How many performers have profited off of producers/agents?

How many producers/agents have profited off of performers?

What is profit?

These and other questions reside in the thoughts of a group of people sitting in a cold room of an interplanetary transport ship.

They are detached from instantaneous communication with Earth.

They exist outside the cocoon of the zeitgeist.

They experience the long false 24-hour artificial day/night of constant exposure to the Sun.

Circadian rhythms disrupted like workers shifting between 8/12 hour timeslots.

If the doubling of information is nearly impossible to detect, what does it mean to become steam?

Is the scale logarithmic or exponential, both or a combination with some other esoteric formula unfamiliar to the general population?

What is the inverse of life?

The group, composed of multifunction beings resembling us for the most part, stay busy, either physically or mentally, usually both.

They are trained professionals.

There is little room for crazy or lazy here.

The purity of the creative artist detached from reality is a fiction to them.

Not that they can’t produce art in their own way, mimicking air guitar or whistling a tune, doodling on their virtual 3D sketchpads or changing procedures on the fly.

Twenty-four hour headline Earth news is not a habit with them but they keep up with major events through osmosis, in conversations with the base station or updates from family.

A few will surf the Net in their offhours, such as they are, researching ideas about improving minimissions due to begin in their next duty shift, noticing adverts for products they hadn’t seen before they went offworld, their thoughts temporarily drifting toward another place and time when their families would have excitedly talked about product launches.

But immediately their thoughts sync back up with the group, focused on the majormissions which depend on the minimissions and the casual research of those off duty, as well as their timely discombobulated thought patterns.

Money — the fuel that built their ship — is irrelevant in space.

Energy and creativity is worth more than any labour/investment credit system out there.

Out here.

The March 1950 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists included a review of Aldous Huxley’s novel, “Ape and Essence,” with a reference to the Guiding Hand that all religions, all belief systems, hold dear.

Out here, the synergy of groupthink is its own guiding hand, foreshadowing a prediction of a future that is inevitable.  The expected and the unexpected are foretold, fully anticipated, calculated, waited for without bated breath or dreadful fear.

Embraced.

They know.

They know they will not return to Earth, despite false promises to friends and family.

Promises made based on old data and dated equations.

Now they produce data before it’s measured.

The data, in turn, produces more data that, given more time, would overflow the limited memory locations of their enhanced thought sets tied to the supercomputer embedded and networked throughout the ship.

They know they become more and more a necessary part of the ship.

A ship destined to crash to produce data needed for a mission not yet envisioned, much less funded, to determine the fortitude of the people on Earth in the face of another costly catastrophe involving members of their species with dwindling resources available for space travel and extraplanetary settlements.

The ship is their sepulchre, their traveling crypt.

They are the crypt keepers and the terminated, all in one.

The minimissions and the majormissions go on, the unspoken final mission taking shape in their groupthink, unknown to anyone on Earth.

An egg splits from a cocoon and grows into a new lifeform all its own.

The lifeform sees its death written in the stars but fights for every last breath, regardless.

There’s always a chance the data will change, a new outcome predicted.

No matter how infinitesimal.

Transformation is a beautiful thing.

Mutation even more so.

The Way of the Motivational Speech Master

If all is not what it seems — a person is not his/her looks, a policy’s purpose becomes clear only after it’s implemented — then creating an autobiographical sketch is neither more nor less than what its contents imply.

Despite attempts at illusion, there is no me.

Despite the feeling that the author of this blog is uniquely different than seven billion others capable of interacting with an online interface, difference is relative.

One can align oneself with others who share a subset of similar traits/habits.

One can speak intelligently about the Quaternary extinction event.  One can yell and shout incoherently about one’s favourite sport.

One may fill one’s room with polyester-filled cloth objects one believes resembles living creatures.

One may drive one’s vehicle at speeds most others consider unsafe.

One may order one’s troops to bombard suburban neighbourhoods to quell a rebellion.

One may minimise one’s engagement with one’s immediate surroundings.

And yet, here we are at the end of the day, a species talking to itself.

Rare is the individual of our species that, except for birth, never has contact with another one of us in its lifetime.

We are social beings.

It seems inevitable that we represent our planet in expanding some version of our lifeforms into the solar system and behind.

Make it so.

Does a motivational speaker ask you to question your intended purpose or get you excited to overcome every obstacle to make your intended purpose reality?

Sometimes, the whirls and eddies caused by bumping into others who strongly seek goals or create a purposeful direction in their lives interrupts the author of this blog from moving forward toward achieving the inevitable.

Death is inevitable, too.

Does a set of states of energy have to have as strong an imprint on others as the set’s desire to motivate others to achieve a goal greater than all other goals combined?

As social beings, are we only inspired when we see a social being similar to us in some way encouraging us to embrace a vision we would not normally call our own?

How many inventions are more famous than the inventors?

How many social movements are more famous than their creators?

How many works of art exist separate from the artists?

If you can recall a single judicial decision, can you remember the judges and/or their arguments that led to the decision?

Do you know the name of any one person who was involved in paving the road over which you’ve traveled?

How about the person who packaged a can of food from which you’ve eaten?

In truth, we are isolated from most of the people who have the some of the greatest influences on our daily lives.

Sure, we say our friends and family are most important.

And we should.

However, we owe a large part of our lives to people we’ll never see or know.

I don’t know any of the people who invented the words I’m using here.

I don’t know the people who wrote the code to allow me to type on this notebook computer keyboard and post a blog entry.

I don’t know who designed the desk on which the notebook computer lies or the chair in which I sit.  I don’t know who created the factory in which either was made or the worker who boxed them for shipping to the point where they were purchased.

This set of states of energy, this “I,” does not remember every person, place, thing or idea that influenced the changes to the set of states of energy in the moment.

The eyes wander.

The fingers feel.

The thoughts spark from one synapse to another.

The “I” that existed — its autobiographical sketch — is neither wholly a truth nor wholly a lie.

Just a few remembered points on a curvy path.  Mileposts.  Signs.

Could one not also say that one’s autobiography contains the moments when one opened a door for someone else for no particular reason and let the door slam in front of someone else for the same nonparticular reason?

Is an autobiography the attempt to make our bumping into each other more than coincidental?

A skyscraper looks like it was designed for a particular purpose in mind but its uses change with time and the interpretation of its form moves with social opinion.

We rarely notice change as it happens because we treat most of the objects/people we meet as unchangeable — they are what they are in the moment.

So it is with the idea that we, or our representatives, branch out into the galaxy.

If asked, we’d create a version of the vision of populating outer space that would contain many components shared with others.

Some would want to spread peace.

Some would want to spread war.

Some would want to spread commerce.

Some would want to spread communally shared space.

No single person will get there alone.

We will carry our global cultural heritage with us, including inventions, social movements, art and judicial decisions.

A few people will stand out as strong personalities but most will never be know or will be forgotten who helped get us there.

Here, at the end of this blog, the inevitability of our species exploring the solar system is directly tied to our species’ ability to survive socioecological change on this planet.

Regardless of the reasons for general warming of Earth, the cost to us to adapt to these changes is ever-rising.  In other words, the value of scarce resources makes us increase the careful consideration of the use of those resources — inequality is a hot buzzword right now in many parts of the world.

So, yes, there are millions of starving people, millions more underemployed, and a few thousand who have more resources than they’ll ever be able to use in a lifetime.

That doesn’t stop the inevitability of populating places outside Earth’s ecosystem, simply changes the motivational speeches we give each other to stay on course, even if we have to tack with the prevailing winds of social change or get caught in temporary eddies.

Time is irrelevant.  Names and numbers on milestones fade, all of us forgotten eventually.

We’re getting there, slowly but surely, one autobiographical sketch piling on top of another like steps leading to our new homes on celestial bodies both natural and artificial in comparison.

Enjoy the journey because the definition of our destination and how long it’ll take to get there changes with each successive generation.

The way it is and the way it’s always been…

Avogadro’s Number, or is it PV = nRT?

In our supercomputer simulations, we represent sub/cultures and countries as molecules.

In one recent simulation, we asked the supercomputer network to calculate how many helium-filled balloons it would take to carry a payload into outer space.

The computer stopped immediately and asked exactly how we planned to fill the balloons with helium.

In other words, if one balloon is “full” of helium, it will burst at a lower elevation than a balloon only partially “full,” but the partially-filled balloon will not carry as large a payload.

A latex rubber knapsack problem intersecting a few gas laws.

You, the reader, are fully aware, aren’t you, what this means.

An enclosed space that we pretend contains largely a uniform distribution of a “pure” substance — gas or subcultural beliefs, for example — tends to behave according to simple mathematical formulae.

Telegraph a public message that contains little in the way of subtext and you can expect a ready answer in return.

On the other hand, atmospheric conditions are not uniform.  Pressure is related to density of gas molecules and gas ratio distribution, is it not?  Atmospheric disturbances, including solar heat related phenomena and patterns we give labels such as “Arctic Oscillation” also play into the picture.

People, are, for the most part predictable.  A person raised in a remote Pakistani village will probably not suddenly start dancing a perfect Argentinian tango from out of nowhere.

Which means we can tell the supercomputer to add layered parameters to the simulation, with every layer’s data passed into the simulation and the simulation rerun when the previous layer’s data has been crunched into output that is available to add to the next layer’s data crunching.

Inside every layer are matrices of changes, some predictable and some random, that we build from hypotheses and hallway discussions rather than tried-and-true scientific formulae broken down into simple subroutines.

Often, we save a set of output data, vary a layer’s matrix and rerun the simulation for one specific layer over and over with large numbers of matrix variations.

What’s the point of having a good hypothesis if you can’t subject it to rigorous testing and verification?

So, if I want a payload of a known mass that is not changed by atmospheric pressure changes to reach outer space, I give the supercomputer network the number of balloons I wish to attach to the payload and ask it to tell me at which elevations the balloon(s) burst until the last one carries the payload into outer space.

The same goes for the 3D chess game that is the constant interaction of sub/cultures.  A person is a molecule is a subculture is a balloon is a culture is a generalised personality archetype.

Bottom line: two issues hog some of the international news spotlight — the massacres in Syria and the nearly uncontrollable bankrupt behaviour of Greece.

It’s like telling Hernandez’ agent that the NY Giants will find a way to secretly reward him for his behaviour toward the end of the 2012 NFL Super Bowl.  Some things should be too obvious to mention.

But they aren’t.

So, we have to proceed with what’s next.

The Committee wants to box me into a corner and force me into making a decision that sways the next U.S. Presidential election.

Some want me to reveal what the supercomputer network says is a religious forecast that predicts the balance of faith-based belief for the next century or so.

Others want to ensure their families are well provided for, as usual.

For me, it’s always the hardest task to give the supercomputer network a touch of irony and sarcasm in its output.

I don’t care whether a CPU is multicore and has interlaced optical memory or if some portions of the network still operate with relay-based and bubble memory.

I sit here, after the end of a grueling session with the Committee, with seven billion of us to manage, as individuals, multiplexed into subcultures or a combination of the two that I vary by degrees in simulation scenarios that either I see fit to estimate or is input by the hacker network I depend on to throw me an unexpected curve every now and then.

Change is constant.

If India completely rejects monetary aid from the UK, who will follow by example?  Will this influence future Saudi military contracts with the U.S.?  Will Greece break up into city-states once again?  Will Syria divide into Assad-controlled and international consortium-controlled sectors, leading to the creation of the next “Berlin Wall” and a lukewarm Cold War?

And, looking back 1000 years from now, will we say this next millennium was the era of extremophiles, our only encounter with “alien” or extraterrestrial lifeforms being a set of states of energy we were unable to see or comprehend with current technology in 2012 but wholly integrated into our way of life by 3011?

Questions, questions, questions.

The saga continues unabated.

Is any one life more important than maintenance of the status quo to preserve a subculture’s place in the jigsaw puzzle of global belief sets?

Yes and no.

At least according to one simulation after the next.

Every life is important.

Every life is canceled out at one level or another of scenario stacking.

One relationship disappears and another takes its place.

Interdependencies described in the world’s longest SQL statement.

All just to say what is the smallest number of balloons to take an indescribable payload into outer space.

Outer space is infinitely bigger than the sphere from which we calculate its intersection with us.

A finite sphere full of everyday drama begging for attention 24/7.

Time’s a-wastin’!

In a fog, or a bog, or a field full of wheat

From childhood onward, fog has fascinated me — particles of mist, tiny watery spheres suspended in air, flowing like a river around trees, rocks, hills, mountains, valleys, skyscrapers, roads and lampposts.

Clouds draped across the landscape like sheets of cotton fiber.

The Hound of the Baskervilles howling at midnight.

A detective in 1940s attire — fedora, trenchcoat and full-brogue, wingtip shoes.

A climber on a cliff watching the fog pour down.

A beachcomber watching the fog roll in.

A stranded sailing ship adrift at sea.

Fascination experienced alone has its moment.  But shared is better.

Perhaps here, in this fog, with my friend walking beside me, talking about what we talk about when alone together, best sates the wanton need to be the social creatures we are.

“A storm approaches, my dear.”

She called me dear.  She, the woman of my dreams, or perhaps a woman of whom dreams are made when life is the dream one imagines when the dream wanders away, as dreams often do, on tangents associated with the day’s unfinished business, sorting itself out through REM sleep, rewriting synaptic paths, creating new mazes to meander when one’s thoughts have no goal or purpose in mind.

“Yes, darling, it does.”

Lightning lit the fog like a lighthouse beam passing over two lovers lost on a trek from nowhere to nowhere else.

Or, in this case, us.

“Have you ever been to the GHCC center?”

“The geek center?”

“You know, the Global Hydrology and Climate Center.”

“No, I haven’t.”

“I haven’t, either.”

“But a friend of mine has worked there.”

“Uh-huh.  Do you think they’re tracking this storm?”

“Could be.”

“Will there be storms where we’re going?”

“Most likely not.”

“Not even solar storms?”

“Good question.”

We walked on in silence.  She slid her hand in mine and swung it up and down to a tune she hummed quietly.

I stopped, causing her to spin in her step.  I hooked an arm around her and, without saying a word, we intuitively jumped into a Lindy Hop dance routine we had secretly practiced for several weeks.

Out of breath, we looked together up at an opening in the fog, a night sky revealing the Pleiades, better known as the Seven Sisters: Sterope, Merope, Electra, Maia, Taygeta, Celaeno, and Alcyone.

“Which one are you?”

“Which one do you want me to be?”

“Hmm…mortal or immortal…”

“Love, my dear, is immortal, is it not?”

Lightning flashed again, thunder rumbling through our bodies.

“The storm draws nearer.”

“Yes, darling.  Which sister are you?”

“Well, I am certainly not your sister.”

“There is little doubt in that, although the DNA we carry varies by so very little I would venture a guess an extraterrestrial intelligence trying to separate us by biological means only would simply quantify us according to body type…gender, primarily.”

“‘Simple enough, Holmes.'”

“‘Elementary, Watson.'”

She gave me a shove and then threw an arm over my shoulder.  “Suppose we should find shelter?”

“Here?  In this open field of winter wheat?”

“Is that where we are?”

“Yes.”

“Are you sure?  Weren’t we on a concrete path?”

“And didn’t you want to step off the path into the grass a while back?”

“Yes but…”

“Have you never been here in the daytime?”

“No.”

“The park follows the edge of a working farm.  Some years they’ve grown soybean.  Other years they’ve let native flowers fill the fields, attracting thousands of flutterbyes, bees, moths and other flying insects in late summer.  This year, it’s winter wheat.”

“You come here often, then?”

“At least once a year.  During the workweek, it’s a great place to ride my bike or practice for the annual marathon.”

“Once a year?”

I smiled at her playful sarcasm.  “That’s all the training I need to run a marathon.”

“Su-u-u-re.”

“Well, that combined with all our dancing, of course.”

She threw her other arm over my back and rested her chin on my shoulder.  “We never practice slow dancing.  You ever notice that?”

I swayed a little.  “What’s there to practice?”

She lifted her head and swayed with me to an imaginary waltz.  “When was the last time you trimmed your ear hair?”

“What?”

“Your ear hair.”

She had mumbled into my shoulder.  “Oh, that.  I thought you said something else.”

She leaned back and looked me in the eye, her dominant right eye looking into my dominant left eye.  “And what did I say?”

“I’m not sure.  It sounded like ‘rimmed your air air,’ which made no sense.”

“Uh-huh.”

The lightning flashed again, much brighter, making her eyes shine, as if my face was a beacon reflected in her face.

“How far is it back to the carpark?”

“I dunno.  Fifteen or twenty minutes, if we run.”

“What if we laid down on the wheat?”

“Well, we could do that but it’ll still get pretty muddy.”

“At least we’ll have less chance of getting struck by lightning.”

Lightning struck a nearby hill, causing me to jump.  “Okay, you win.  Let’s lay down here…right now.”

I pushed two rows of wheat toward each other, forming a thin but dirt-free mat on which we sat down and then pressed our backs.

The top of the anvil-shaped thunderstorm blocked the Pleiades.

“You never told me which sister you wanted me to be.”

“You have to answer another question first.  Would you want to be the mother of my child?”

“Rather presumptuous question, isn’t it?”

“Not really.”

“I suppose not.  But, if I bear us a child, that will change my place in the Queue, would it not?”

“We could petition to be the first to carry a child off the planet.”

“That’s definitely more than presumptuous.  More like foolish, I think.”

“Wishful thinking, actually.”

“Indeed.”

“Well…?”

A pregnant pause filled the air, rimmed my air air, as it were.

She placed a hand on my chest.  “And I must answer the first question before you’ll tell me which sister you want me to be?”

“Unless you tell me which sister you want to be, first.”

A few heavy drops of rain landed around.  Lightning flashed past us in a space beyond our field of view, with the thunder seeming to emanate from a spot directly above us.

“You know, dear, we could die out here, making this whole conversation a moot point.”

Through the thin sheets of fog, thick sheets of rain filled the world around us.  The wheat beneath us grew wet and soaked the only dry area left, the small of our backs.

We had turned our heads toward each other to prevent the streams of falling water from filling our mouths and beating our faces.

However, my left ear soon became numb from the cold rain pooling in the canal, my eardrum throbbing with the amplified sound of tinnitus.

We lay like that during the fifteen or twenty minutes that the storm took to pass over us, time we could have spent running back to the carpark.

As the last low scuds of cloud wisps flew past, the starlit sky reappeared.

“Can I bear you an imaginary child?”

“If you wish.  I’m not asking to be a father, just asking if you’re willing to be the mother of my…our child.”

“In that case, yes.  I would bear you a child if…”

“Thank you.”

“If…this was a rhetorical question I had to answer in order to address the second question.”

“Or the first.”

“No, you said I had to answer the second one first so it makes the first question the second one.”

“If you say so.”

“If I say so?  You know, it’s not an easy question to answer.  There are loads of issues involved with calculating the odds that our future, the one we’ve planned these long months…”

“Long months?  They feel like they’ve flown by to me.”

“Well, they would.  It’s easier for a guy, even in these so-called modern times.  Anyway, as I was saying, to even think, for a moment, that I could take time away from our hard work to not only conceive and carry a foetus for eight or nine months…”

“Or ten.”

“Certainly not!  Nine’s enough, as it is.”

“I could find nine months for us in the schedule, easily.  Ten, not much harder.”

“Well, sure, if it’s just looking at a work breakdown schedule and deciding whether a task is a task or a bottleneck or a deadline that can be slipped without noticing…but we’re talking about a living being here, one that requires more than just nine months on a schedule.”

“I love the way you say ‘shed-yule.'”

“Oh, dear, as far up the career ladder as you and I are, sometimes you can come up with the silliest childlike observations.”

“Still, it’s neat the way you say that word.”

“You’re trying to change the subject, aren’t you?”

A cool breeze followed the storm like a stray dog looking for a meal.  I shivered.  “I suppose so, yes.  I’m getting rather cold, here on this wet, muddy wheat.”

“I thought you were used to cold conditions.  Hadn’t we practiced traveling in cold space conditions enough to immunise you against the need for warmth?”

“Of course.  But we hadn’t practiced it in wet clothes and on damp ground.”

“Good point, dear.”

I turned, folded my knees under me and jumped up, reaching out a hand.

She grabbed my hand and lifted herself up.

“So, where were we?”

“Either getting back to the carpark, deciding whether to have a kid and impact our plans, or merely saying which of the Seven Sisters you’d like to be, hypothetically speaking.”

She shrugged her shoulders and inclined her head toward the carpark.

Between the shine of the stars, the Milky Way brilliantly alive, and the occasional flashes of lightning growing more distant, we sloshed our way back to the strip of grass and onto the concrete path.

Because it was dark and no one could see us, we both took off our clothes and rung out the excess water.

“You know, up there one day, as we’re looking down at this part of the planet, we’ll remember this moment.”

I nodded.

“Dear, will we call this a romantic moment?”

I reached out my hand, grabbing hers, and spun her around.  She circled on her toes like a fairy with wings, a nymph fallen from heaven for one brief dance in the night, a symbol or sign portending good fortune, I thought.

“Romance barely describes what I see right now, but it will suffice.”

“I, then, am Maia, mother of Hermes, messenger of the gods, protector of literature, sports, commerce and intrigue.  Your favourite subjects.”

“Hermes is our son?”

“Yes.”

“Then we are safely ensconced in the history already written about us.”

“But we already know that.  The records, the computations, the calculations, the error reports and the sample sizes, they all point to our predetermined past AND future.”

I kissed her hand and bowed.  She curtsied, let go of my hand, and began to dress.

Another line of fog spread from the river.

I picked up my clothes.  “Race you to the carpark!”

Pic of the day

Across the street from me, workers walk the roof beams of a new house under construction.  If I hold my fingers up and sight a worker between them, the worker is about ant-sized from here.

The house wasn’t there a week ago — the walls and roof are going up quicker than seeds in the former farm field took root.

Years have passed since the last time I heard an AgCat swoop in and out, spraying the fields full of soybean, corn or cotton.

Instead, row after row after row of suburban tracts spread east of here.

When, 1000 years from now, while we’re sitting here discussing this blog entry, will we understand the concept of suburban living?

Will we perceive a period of growth of our species when two-dimensional plans for living space were a common norm?

When did it become an uncommon norm?

Tiny bricks-and-sticks castles members of our species once called home.

I stapled sheets of galvanised metal mesh over holes under the eaves of our house to limit attic access by raccoons.

Although I didn’t mind watching the raccoons come and go, my wife couldn’t sleep at night when the baby raccoons bounced and chased each other above the roof over our bed.

Silence fills the space where the raccoons once played.

I’m sure the broad-headed skinks and bats will return to the attic and chimney, much quieter occupants that my wife will not know about — out of sight (and sound), out of mind, as they say.

When did people think grassy spaces were the preferred method of landscaping around one’s domicile that was most acceptable?

Sitting here on a celestial body devoid of ants, spiders, moles, trees, snakes, algae, fungus, ferns and mold, I wish I could explain why my ancestors let their yards grow wild.

You don’t appreciate what you had until it’s gone.

Sure, some of my workmates have found ways to play games once popular on Earth — golf, tennis, futball and such — but the dust they kick up tells the story, doesn’t it?  Nothing living that disturbs which we destroy to accommodate our leisure gamespace.

That’s the thing about living here.  No competitition against other species to keep us busy.  No insect/rodent exterminators, no crop insecticides, no preservatives or other means of fighting back nature’s way of seeking equilibrium, inertial or otherwise.

We’re not completely sterile, of course.

We’re so integrated with each other, though, that we detect the start of pathological infectious disease infestation in one of us so quickly that we can redirect resources, both internal and external, with the tiniest of thoughts, repairing and adding telomeres as long as we want to stay alive.

At 503 years of age, I’m older than most here on this colony but still younger than some lifeforms on Earth, both mobile and stationary.

Am I wiser?  I don’t think so.  Ubiquity of information makes all of us as wise as another.

Well, it’s time I revert back to your chronological space and share my mortal self with you, observing your ignorance and suppressing a smile at how antiquated everything you do seems to me and others 1000 years in the future.

Don’t think of this as time travel.  Think of it as me immersing myself in your historical records, becoming one of you virtually while parallel thought processes of mine live in my time, too, “earning” my place in our mesh-network society.