The stuff of life

A nod to food lover’s celebration of National Croissant Day.

Last night, while I was working on the computer, my wife watched a television show centered on competing celebrity cooks.  One of the cooks, named Rachael, commented that a guest on the show, her publicist, was her closest friend only because she paid him to be (or something like that).  I’m sure she was joking but the look on the guy’s face…well, I won’t watch another show with my wife when that particular celebrity cook is on.  Either her jokes fall flat or her friends are being paid enough to pretend to like her.

Besides, here in the States, the quinessential professional sporting event that centers on husky guys bashing their minds to pieces is coming up — the NFL Super Bowl, of course.

Speaking of which, will the Indianapolis Colts survive as a/n inter/national brand if a new quarterback takes the helm from an elitist school like Stanford?  It’s one thing to be good or even great at the position — it’s another to be the complete “regular guy” package, John Elway an example of the exception rather than the rule.

Enough of the chattering.  Time to give the reluctant leader his word on the state of the world economy:

Last night, as the Committee debated whether Greece should be more intricately tied into the global indebtedness scheme or cast aside as worthless chattel, I looked at the Committee members’ face, hooded as they are beneath a variety of caps, hats, hairstyles and heavy eyelids.

What were they thinking?  I can look back at supercomputer analysis of their previous behaviour and make a well-educated guess as to what they’ll do/say next, but in those moments before they speak or act, can I assess, can I surmise, can I imagine the vast difference between how their brains work and how the brains work of non-Committee members?

Therefore, I turned up the sensitivity of the brain readers mounted in the walls, floor, and ceiling of the room to answer my question.

The results amazed me.  It was not only the individual brains that astounded but also the smooth transition between chemical emissions of the individuals, basically how their/our whole bodies acted as one at the molecular level, that impressed me.

Which made me realise we are one species on one planet as always.

No matter how we decide to treat the disparity between the Greek economic output and monetary inflow, we must still deal with them — the Greek people and their in/efficient enterprising ways — as part of our species’ total interaction.

In other words, if the density of people per square hectare in certain parts of the world — I’m thinking of India and China, especially, but can think of other places, too, such as Bangladesh — encourages them to continue their outward migration, would Greece remain Greece if the traditional inhabitants loosely associated with descendancy from those Greeks who formed what we think of classic Greek art/architecture/philosophy/science (i.e., “Ancient Greece“) were completely replaced with people from other cultures, who may or may not have completely assimilated?

You get where this going, don’t you?  Are the Committee members dedicated to preserving Greece as the seat or foundation of Western Civilisation even if the people of Greece are no longer related to the founders of Ancient Greece?

Ultimately, are economic decisions purely economic?  After all, we aren’t unemotional robots moving numbers in a spreadsheet.  Culture still plays a part in our daily lives.

How do we want sub/culture — past, present and future — to influence us at the superficial and molecular level?

I guess the reluctant leader would like a view 1000 years from now to tell him which decisions worked best, wouldn’t he?

Let’s save that view for another blog entry.  Time for more music…

Is currency exchange rate management the problem or one of many solutions??

Long after we solved the riddle of DNA restructuring, creating enzyme processes that helped manufacture biological nanobots that currently form the entity you would think of as an advanced version of your own body in “our” species (note to self: spend future blog entry defining or redefining the concept of species), we ended up here — autonomous “cells” that can communicate faster with each other than the former central nervous system and blood vessel network with which you’re intimately familiar.

I am doing my best to translate our communication symbol set into one of your common languages so that others who come after me can more readily study the moving boxcar average of changes from one communication method to another in 1000 year increments.

We do not use terms like nanobots or cells to describe the building blocks which morph from one in/organic entity to another as needed to accomplish a task here in the outer limits of the solar system where we gather and harvest comets in the Oort Cloud region, some of us in the Hills Cloud region as needed to support inner solar system operations.

We also solved the problem of our species’ former tribal habit of dividing into altruistic and self-serving individuals by allowing the formation of what you would call organs to carry out the self-serving function within a single body (the body’s current morphed shape, that is), developing an automatic method for all individuals to display primarily altruistic functions through their desire to find a useful niche and perform duties at maximum, optimal rates without jeopardising the nanobots or cells within the current morphed version of a self in operation.

The ability to search the network and “find one’s place,” as you say, has given freedom a whole new meaning.

Self-governance has removed the inefficient method of hoarding that our species once displayed, from crowding living quarters with loads of unusual objects to filling electronic banking records with billions of underused investment/labour credits, which led to the uniting of citizens, police and military units around the world to overthrow despotic dictatorial totalitarians and overpriced capitalists (as well as their overvalued offspring).

During this time, scientists, rarely interested in politics unless it interferes with their publicly-funded pure research facilities, accelerated their development of autonomous nanobots that form networks of interconnected beings which, as many of you can read now, became completely reconfigurable entities that resemble you and think like you but are nothing like you at all.

It was an exciting but chaotic time in our history.

Every individual, no matter how seemingly isolated from others of our kind, contributes to significant changes in our local part of the universe.

Of course, I could bother you with details of the ebb and flow of violent reactions by entrenched leaders interested in maintaining the status quo.  However, let’s save that for a day when news is slow and you want to take a leisurely detour down the backroads of unimportant historic changes since, here in our time, the unnecessarily disruptive behaviour associated with war, social strife and governmental upheavals is no longer considered worth studying.

Now, the fully-meshed network of interconnected nanobots changes to meet the wants/needs at the network, subnetwork and node (that’s you/me) level on a nanosecond scale, readily moving resources to areas where they’re needed most, thus eliminating the “survivalist” hoarding behaviour that dogged our species for millennia.

Those of you whose descendants chose to become plants will want to find out how that branch of science turned out, I’m sure.  They certainly changed our perception of consciousness.

But we can talk about that later.  It’s a beautiful “day” out here.  As I corral some comets using my trusty sidekicks, E-stache and E-crab, to herd the comets together, I’ll spend a few yoctocycles to translate more of our history into this language and record it later in a format you call a blog entry.

When my three parents had three parents who came from three parents who…

Today I celebrate the birthday of a person dear to me so my observations of your world from 1000 years later will wait until tomorrow.

Therefore, here are your two data points and that’s it:

You get your bonus, too!;

Best comment of the day, in response to this post:

  • HandandShrimp25 January 2012 8:40PM

    Mildly surprised that “Do you want Scotland to be an independent country?” was chosen over Labour’s preferred “Do you want to recklessly break the Union and give everyone leprosy?”

Don’t we all feel this way?

“偶然重拾荒蕪已久的稿紙,那未了的書寫工程,其實暗藏勃勃生機。既面對現實,也面對歷史,可以另闢一個戰場。庸俗的政治權力,並不能遮蔽真實的歷史。坐在城市邊緣,又坐在鳳凰樹的葉影下,春天的陽光再次照射在空白的稿紙。站在一片廢墟,帶著清理戰場的心情,又回到沒有輸贏的文學閱讀。早年的許諾,並不能藉由政治形式來實現。迂迴走過旋轉的道路,最後還是回到原點。政治往往是一種減法,排除所有意識形態的異端,也建造一座封閉的城堡。文學是一種加法,以開放的態度容許異質的藝術想像。權力是一座迷宮,文學是一個出口;政治史是興亡史,文學史是傳承史。”

文/陳芳明

Word

So we “cancel” Greek debt with no hope the Greek government/private sectors will ever pay back what they owed?

Hmm…

What does that tell us about the rest of the EU/world?

Warren Buffett can play guitar, for beginners (or is that starters?).

Telling us we’re all just regular people in one way or another.

Okay…

I agree.

However [scratching head while two cats warm my knees and crawl space crickets sprout after a midwinter rain], it’s not us creditors I mull over.

Which reminds me.  Ever wonder why you can buy cold beer and hot chocolate at an outdoor sports event but not hot fermented beverages?  What about warm, spiced beer at the next football or hockey game, huh?

Anyway, debt is the word.

The question.

The answer.

Cyclical crises are perennial and require perennial solutions, don’t they?

Or do they?

Is Bloomberg still taking programming lessons?

Does the Panic of [1819/1837/1873/1893/1907] have any relevance today, despite nomenclature games that this one has to be different because we’re so much more modern in our economic understanding, etc.?

Change is change even when you end up with no pocket change to speak of.

Next, we’ll go from an anonymous Netizen Manifesto to a Netizen Bill of Rights to a group of people declaring themselves members of no country except the virtual/online one in which they elect their nongeographical solar system representatives.

So, yes, let’s cancel Greek debt but at the same time declare Greece is no longer a real country in the old sense.

A tourist attraction, perhaps.

Other than that, its people are free to join the new Netizenry, subject to crowdsourced laws and regulations, few as they are (governed mainly by gravity and other natural laws).

The cats say it’s time for bed and sleep.

I agree.

G’night.

Book ’em in the library

Reading about the tragic loss of lives in protests around the world saddens me.

Reading about the tragic loss of writings in Egypt makes me angry.

Reminds me of the following passage on p. 194 of the paperback edition of “The Man Who Loved Books Too Much”:

In callously stealing, mutilating, and destroying rare and unique elements of our common intellectual heritage, Spiegelman did not simply aim to divest Columbia of $1.3 million worth of physical property.  He risked stunting, and probably stunted, the growth of human knowledge to the detriment of us all.  By the very nature of the crime, it is impossible to know exactly what damage he has done.  But this much is clear: this crime was quite different from the theft of cash equal to the appraised value of the material stolen, because it deprived not only Columbia, but the world, of irreplaceable pieces of the past and the benefits of future scholarship.

We cannot replace people entirely and, yes, we can make copies of the records people leave behind, including writing, works of art, etc., but we cannot replace the unique combination of waveform interaction in the original editions when people were living in the moment.

Someone told me that members of the U.S. Congress are hard-working.  I think the person intended to say hard-headed but is too polite in conversations about politicians in general.

When the Russians are complaining about Chinese manufacturing quality, you know it’s real (translation from Izvestiya):

December 21, 2011, 21:07 | Army | Denis Thalmann, Veronica Fomicheva

Военных хотят защитить от китайской формы Want to protect the military from the Chinese form

Чиновники пытаются запретить производство российского камуфляжа из заграничной ткани Officials are trying to ban the production of Russian camouflage of foreign tissue

 

Фото: Екатерина Штукина Photo: Catherine Shtukin

Минпромторг совместно с Минэкономразвития планирует ограничить использование для пошива военной формы тканей зарубежного производства, в том числе китайской, сообщил источник в военном ведомстве. Ministry of Industry jointly with the Ministry plans to limit the use of sewing uniforms for foreign-made textiles, including China, a source in the Defense Ministry. Сейчас около 50% гимнастерок и бушлатов шьются из дешевой китайской ткани, при этом 20% из них не отвечают требованиям ГОСТа. Now about 50% of tunics and jackets are made of cheap Chinese cloth, with 20% of them do not meet the requirements of GOST. Военные говорят, что не могут контролировать закупки своих поставщиков. The military say they have no control over the purchase of their suppliers.

— Мы можем при объявлении тендера объявить требования к качеству ткани — – We can announce at the tender requirements for quality fabrics –
составу, типу плетения, физическим свойствам, — но не можем указывать, у composition, type of weave, physical properties, – but we can not specify a
кого именно они должны эти ткани покупать, 30-й федеральный закон нам это запрещает, — рассказали «Известиям» в Минобороны. whom they should buy these fabrics, the 30th is a federal law prohibits us – told “Izvestia” the Defense Ministry.

Собеседник пояснил, что военным неважно, из ткани какого производителя сшита форма, главное, чтобы она соответствовала предъявленным требованиям. The interviewee explained that the military does not matter what manufacturer of fabric sewn form, more importantly, to match your requirements. Для проверки этого соответствия каждая партия формы проходит экспертизу и выбраковку. To check this correspondence, each party is a form examination and culling.

— По моим данным, случаев поступления в войска формы из некачественной – According to my information, admissions in the form of low-quality troops
ткани не зафиксировано, — утверждает информированный офицер. tissue is not fixed, – says the officer informed.

Как рассказал коммерческий директор ООО «БМК-Текстиль» Максим Ильин, производителю, который выиграл тендер, сейчас ничто не мешает одну партию формы выпустить из российской ткани, а остальные — пошить из азиатской. As Commercial Director said, “BMC-Textiles” Maxim Ilin, the manufacturer, which won the tender, now nothing to prevent one party from the Russian form of release of tissue, and the rest – from Asian to sew.

— Погонный метр отечественной ткани стоит 140 рублей, китайской — 90. – Running meter national fabric is 140 rubles, China – 90. На одну летнюю форму уходит примерно 4 м полотна. At one year form takes about 4 m leaf. При заказе, скажем, в 50 тыс. комплектов только на разнице в тканях фабрика сэкономит до 10 млн рублей, — подсчитывает Ильин. When ordering, say, 50 thousand sets only on the difference in the tissues of the factory will save up to 10 million rubles – calculates Ilyin.

Но за дешевизну приходится платить качеством. But for cheapness has to pay quality. Китайская ткань почти целиком состоит из полиэфира — материала, который делают из пластиковых отходов — бутылок, тарелок и пакетов. Chinese fabric consists almost entirely of polyester – a material which is made from plastic waste – bottles, trays and bags. И, в отличие от качественных тканей, не содержит хлопка или вискозы. And, unlike quality fabrics, not cotton or viscose contains. А российские ткачи вынуждены соблюдать ГОСТы. A Russian weavers are forced to comply with state standards.

— Профессиональные производители называют китайские ткани «стеклом». – Professional manufacturers of Chinese fabrics called “glass”. Тело Body
в ней совершенно не дышит. it absolutely was not breathing. Военные в такой форме рискуют получить кожные и аллергические болезни, — говорит Максим Ильин. The military in such form and at risk of skin allergies, – said Maxim Ilin.

Ни в одной из опрошенных «Известиями» компаний, выигравших тендеры Минобороны на форму, не согласились обсуждать страну происхождения тканей, из которых шьют форму. None of the respondents “Izvestia” of companies that won tenders to form the Ministry of Defense, did not agree to discuss the country of origin of fabrics sewn form.

Только на одном комбинате, которой выполняет заказ военных, на условиях анонимности рассказали, что раньше закупали ткани в Китае, а сейчас не рискуют из-за отсутствия гарантии качества. Only one plant, which serves military order, on condition of anonymity said they had bought the fabric in China, and now not at risk because of a lack of quality assurance.

— У зарубежных поставщиков нет никаких обязательств перед Минобороны, они – In foreign suppliers do not have any obligations to the Ministry of Defense, they
не обеспечивают мобилизационный резерв страны, поэтому вполне могут вместо not provide a mobilization reserve of the country, so it may instead
одного типа ткани поставить другой. one type of fabric to put on the other. А мы ведь не можем проверять качество каждого рулона — шьем из того, что привезли со склада. But we have not been able to check the quality of each roll – sew from the fact that they brought from the warehouse. А иногда различия на глаз не видны — с виду ткани одинаковы. And sometimes the differences are not visible to the eye – with the same tissue type. Поэтому от греха подальше мы не связываемся с китайцами — шьем из российских тканей. Therefore, away from sin we do not associate with the Chinese – sew a Russian tissues. Тем более цены сейчас почти не различаются, — рассказал «Известиям» представитель пошивочного предприятия. Especially since the prices are almost no different – told “Izvestia” the representative of the sewing business.

По его словам, если военная приемка выявит несоответствие использованных тканей техзаданию, указанному во время тендера, швейный комбинат заносится в «черный список» и исключается из борьбы за госзаказ. According to him, if the military inspection will reveal inconsistency of used tissues terms of reference specified in the tender, a sewing factory entered in the “black list” and is excluded from the struggle for state orders.

— В лаборатории некачественную ткань вычислить очень легко — она по-другому – In the laboratory, low-quality fabric is easy to calculate – it differently
реагирует на растворители, иначе горит. reacts to solvents, or burning. Соответственно, выявить форму из Accordingly, to identify the form of
некачественных тканей очень просто. defective tissue is very simple. Но раз такая форма в армию попадает, военные, видимо, не очень тщательно проверяют, — отметил представитель швейного комбината. But once this form goes to the army, military, apparently, not very carefully checked, – the representative of the sewing factory.

Он отметил, что пока в России не будут введены прямые ограничения на использование импортных тканей, производители будут неизбежно выбирать те, что подешевле. He noted that while in Russia will not put direct restrictions on the use of imported fabrics, manufacturers will inevitably choose those that are cheaper.

Директор компании «Чайковский текстиль» Евгений Титов рассказал, что кроме химического состава российские ткани превосходят китайские в первую очередь качеством плетения и химической обработки. Director of “Tchaikovsky Textile” Titov said that besides the chemical composition of tissue superior Russian, Chinese in the first place the quality of weaving and chemical processing.

— Себестоимость тканей одинакового качества в России и в Китае примерно одинакова, тем более с учетом транспортных и таможенных расходов. – The cost of the same quality fabrics in Russia and in China about the same, especially in view of transport and customs costs. Поэтому если цена на китайскую ткань ниже в два раза, то, значит, там занижено качество, по-другому не бывает, — отметил Титов. Therefore, if the price of Chinese fabric below two times, it means that there is too low quality, in other words it is not – said Titov.

Согласно проекту постановления правительства, разработанному в Минпромторге и Минэкономразвития, камвольные ткани, используемые для изготовления вещевого имущества, должны будут иметь российское происхождение. According to the draft government decision, developed in Minpromtorge and Economic Development, worsted fabric used to make clothing and equipment will have to be of Russian origin. Сейчас проект находится на согласовании в правительстве. Now the project is being coordinated by the government.

При этом, по данным «Известий», происхождение ниток, из которых будут ткать полотна в России, в документе не регламентировано, а значит, запретить ткацким фабрикам использовать китайские нитки в производстве российских тканей не сможет никто. In this case, according to “Izvestiya”, the origin of thread, of which will weave fabric in Russia, the document is not regulated and, therefore, to prohibit use of Chinese textile factory in the production of yarn fabrics Russian nobody can.

Ancient quote of the day

Although the times were warlike and the fates
Called to the fray, he lent a willing ear.
Yet must they plight their faith in simple form
Of law; their witnesses the gods alone.
No festal wreath of flowers crowned the gate
Nor glittering fillet on each post entwined;
No flaming torch was there, nor ivory steps,
No couch with robes of broidered gold adorned;
No comely matron placed upon her brow
The bridal garland, or forbad the foot (15)
To touch the threshold stone; no saffron veil
Concealed the timid blushes of the bride;
No jewelled belt confined her flowing robe (16)
Nor modest circle bound her neck; no scarf
Hung lightly on the snowy shoulder’s edge
Around the naked arm. Just as she came,
Wearing the garb of sorrow, while the wool
Covered the purple border of her robe,
Thus was she wedded. As she greets her sons
So doth she greet her husband. Festal games
Graced not their nuptials, nor were friends and kin
As by the Sabines bidden: silent both
They joined in marriage, yet content, unseen
By any save by Brutus. Sad and stern
On Cato’s lineaments the marks of grief
Were still unsoftened, and the hoary hair
Hung o’er his reverend visage; for since first
Men flew to arms, his locks were left unkempt
To stream upon his brow, and on his chin
His beard untended grew. ‘Twas his alone
Who hated not, nor loved, for all mankind
To mourn alike. Nor did their former couch
Again receive them, for his lofty soul
E’en lawful love resisted. ‘Twas his rule
Inflexible, to keep the middle path
Marked out and bounded; to observe the laws
Of natural right; and for his country’s sake
To risk his life, his all, as not for self
Brought into being, but for all the world:
Such was his creed. To him a sumptuous feast
Was hunger conquered, and the lowly hut,
Which scarce kept out the winter, was a home
Equal to palaces: a robe of price
Such hairy garments as were worn of old:
The end of marriage, offspring. To the State
Father alike and husband, right and law
He ever followed with unswerving step:
No thought of selfish pleasure turned the scale
In Cato’s acts, or swayed his upright soul.

Balsa Struts and Tissue Paper

Have you ever created a reason to walk door-to-door, meeting your neighbours, greeting strangers who have internal imagery that defines their perfect center of the universe in domiciles that may or may not define domestic bliss?

In my door-to-door adventures, I asked for Halloween candy; have sold: raffle tickets for junior high school sock hops, desk lamps and other catalog items for Cub/Boy Scout projects, candles and oranges for high school marching band trips, mini-encyclopedias for college spending money; delivered free telephone books; taken survey information for the 2010 U.S. Census.

In the forty or so years of these face-to-face encounters, I have seen houses full of African violets, mobile homes full of marijuana plants, dog/cat feces all over the floor, spotlessly-clean living rooms (implying there was little in the way of living going on in them), ethnic diversity in areas where homogeneity was most coveted, souvenir dinner plates covering walls, people answering the door in a variety of [un]dress and people being as quiet as they can, refusing to open the door.

Do you know the official history of the spot where you call home, even if it’s a carpark where your Travelers’ caravan sits temporarily?

I am a vagabond of thought patterns, meandering from place to place, committed neither to one thought pattern nor another, aware of the vanity that goes with believing any one thought set is a permanent solution to anything in particular.

I have a childhood drawing with three names on the bottom: Rick Hill, Jeff Garwood and Suzanne Trimble.  I guess the drawing was made sometime between the third and sixth year of primary school.

I know the first person very well, have lost touch with the second person and the third person is about to spend seven months in Germany for reasons unknown to me.

However, these three people well represent the types of people I met in my door-to-door wanderings as a child encouraged to impress himself upon his neighbours to exchange labour credits/money for goods/services.

I painted houses, mowed lawns, raked leaves and helped friends in their newspaper delivery routes to provide myself the economic power to participate in the local marketplace during my teenage years.

I suppose children are still providing these services to put spending money in their pockets and deposits in their bank accounts, a few of them buying stamps, comic books, dolls or other collectibles and/or government savings bonds and company stock for investments.

Broken-balsa-wood-and-torn-tissue-paper windup-rubber-band-powered airplanes sit atop dusty stacks of books around me.

A rusty model rocket launch pad rod sticks up out of shopping bag labeled “CIRCUSWORLD TOY & VIDEO CENTER.”

A telescope points toward the ground.

On a pile next to me rests a wire kitchen strainer once used as a parabolic wireless network signal concentrator/reflector.

These items serve as keys or bookmarks for memory locations inside my body.

The generic brick-and-mortar, vinyl-sided, stacked-box objects we call home serve as memory locations for inhabitants, too.

A cave or a bamboo hut.

An adobe hacienda or stone castle.

We are rarely aware of the network of memory locations within us that are triggered by external objects like our homes and their contents.

Is your home rich with memories, both good and bad?

Or, like some of the sterile environments I observed when going door-to-door, is your home mostly unused, filled with objects about which you have little memory recall, the TV and computer serving more as an extension of your thought set than the furniture and facsimile paintings on the walls?

A fellow blogger posted that her friends find her boring.  It’s a matter of perspective.  How imaginative is the thought set of the blogger?  How rich are her memories of growing up?

The Internet has opened the gates that once allowed only the most persistent, imaginative people to appear in mass media.

Now, everyone with a computing device (computer, tablet or mobile phone) can appear in a one-person off-Broadway autobiographical show — a slice of life with no beginning or end, no plot, no climax, just a character carrying on about whatever it is that character wants to put on display.

Liberté, égalité, fraternité.  E pluribus unum.

On a side note, is it just me or does the US FTC (Federal Trade Commission) emblem look like the mask that some of the global protestors have been wearing?: