Fever, Either, Or, Favour

He looked at the thermometer sticking out of his mouth.  The digital display read 37.6 deg Celsius.

Low-grade, at least.

His ears throbbed.

Was this sufficient reason (or excuse) to visit the infirmary?

Two more weeks of training…he didn’t want a negative mark on his progress report.

A fellow trainee, Rogemme, walked up.

“So, you going for the ejection seat, are you?”

Lee shook his head.  “No, but my head feels like it’s floating on its own.”

“Everyone seems to have what you’ve got.  Think it’s what they say, a conspiracy to close down the training center?”

“You haven’t got it, have you?”

“Nope.”

“Then not everyone has it, have they?”

“Well, if it’s just me here, it wouldn’t be much of a graduating class now, would it?”

Rogemme laughed and walked away, shaking her head.

Lee stood up and felt his ears ringing like live electrical wires arcing or fluorescent lamp ballasts buzzing.

So everyone’s got this same thing…

He picked up his open copy of “Hidden Economic Subtrends Revealed by Supercomputer Algorithms” and read two pages.

He read them again.

He read them a third time but couldn’t seem to get the words, ideas or images invoked by the words to stick to his thoughts.

Was it the low-grade fever or something else that prevented his normal meditative state of learning to evade him?

He put the e-book down, leaving the book open for anyone else to read, including those in the class who hadn’t paid their dues and weren’t allowed to read other copies for free, a prime condition of Economic History Warehouse Keepers, Private Second Class, to maintain their rank.

He pressed a button on his earlobe that had been implanted to look like an earring but actually operated a wireless control system embedded alongside his left ear canal.

He rotated his finger around the edge of the button until he found the same place in the audible book where he had been reading “Hidden Economic Subtrends Revealed by Supercomputer Algorithms,” hoping that by listening to someone reading the book and explaining through a series of footnotes he’d paid extra to get, he’d penetrate the cushiony pillow exteriour that seemed to block his thoughts from learning class material in the moment solely by running his eyes over the written text.

As a sentient supercomputer algorithm taking the familiar form of a member of the species Homo sapiens, Lee had responsibilities, including this unknown infection, to add to his regular computational duties.

He’d excelled at hormone level modification, removing all unnecessary emotional outbursts usually associated someone of his rank.

At first, the lecturers reported his emotional control as an anomaly, sending him many times for medical examinations that found nothing more than the post-autism syndrome that previous generations of his type had helped “real” members of the species to apply gene therapy and foetal DNA reconfiguration to overcome the worst inarticulate aspects of autism.

Some classmates called him cold and calculating, both an insult and compliment at the same time.

He, however, ignored their taunts, his algorithmic tendencies giving him a larger view of life than the immediacy that sweaty bodies and physical alterations tended to drive mob mentality to its worst-case scenario outputs.

In his spare moments, he had studied the history of the “real” people, noting how they talked about subcultures and job classifications that seemed little different than the categories he and fellow algorithms had been assigned at initial creation.

Lee felt liquid on his upper lip and decided that watery mucus pouring out of his nose was an inconvenience but the overall conditions of the infection warranted a visit to the infirmary, after all.  He did not have access to online material that would have told him whether an elevated body temperature or range of temperatures would adversely affect other circuitry concealed on his body for experimental purposes only.

He knew he was really the same as the “real” people but he also knew he was a special prototype created from special molecular combinations meant to determine if DNA that had given rise to the biological diversity of Earth was only one of many possible atomic-level conditions for life.

By training him and his pals in a sequestered training class, the lecturers and those for whom they honed the classmates’ algorithm/subroutine repetitive output would assure themselves that graduating members awarded Economic History Warehouse Keepers, Private Second Class, would never want to leave their assignments for fear that unseen authorities would confuse the graduates with “real” people whose outputs were normally predictable but more often given to mob mentality than they.

As Lee absorbed the book’s spoken words which told him why living algorithms like him were destined for a higher purpose because their output revealed hidden meaning, he walked toward the infirmary, wiping his nose on his sleeve which shimmered slightly because the nasal liquid provided a short circuit across the fibers of his shirt, itself a living subroutine that resembled clothing.

The shirt sent a message on to the infirmary that it would need to be changed — its memory transferred to Lee’s next new shirt, then erased — and laundered as soon as possible to prevent staining, after the infectious organisms had been removed and sent for analysis.

Georgia (no, not Russia) and Russia (no, not Moscow, Idaho)

But can he ride a rocket out of the country?

December 14, 2011, 19:15 | Science | Ivan Cheberko 3

Ракетчики останутся в заложниках у Родины Rocketeers will remain hostage to the Motherland

Руководитель Роскосмоса Владимир Поповкин запретил ездить на отдых за границу носителям государственных тайн Head of Russian Federal Space Agency Vladimir Popovkin forbidden to go on holiday abroad holders of state secrets

Rocketeers will remain hostage to the MotherlandРуководитель Федерального космического агентства (Роскосмос) Владимир Поповкин. Head of Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos) Vladimir Popovkin. Фото: РИА НОВОСТИ/Артем Житенёв Photo: RIA Novosti / Artem Zhitenev

Руководитель Manager Федерального Federal космического Space агентства Agency Владимир Vladimir Поповкин Popovkin запретил banned выезд exit за for границу border на on отдых recreation руководителям managers и and сотрудникам employees предприятий businesses Роскосмоса , осведомленных Russian Space Agency, informed о of секретных Secret сведениях . clues.

— – Письмо « Об Letter “On the ограничении Restrictions выезда Check out из of РФ RF работников employees организаций Organizations ракетно – космической Rocket – Space промышленности » датировано 22 ноября , — рассказал « Известиям » высокопоставленный Industry “dated November 22, – told” Izvestia “senior источник source в in Роскосмосе . Roskosmos. — В – In тексте text руководитель manager рекомендует Recommends ограничить limit с 1 января 2012 года from January 1, 2012 выезд exit за for пределы limits РФ RF на on отдых recreation руководителей leaders и and работников , осведомленных employees who are aware о of сведениях DATA особой special важности the importance of или or совершенно секретных Top Secret сведениях DATA организаций. organizations.

Запрет Ban касается As for не not только only организаций Organizations и and предприятий , подведомственных enterprises under the jurisdiction of Роскосмосу . Речь Roscosmos. It также also идет is об about организациях , с organizations, with которыми which у in государства State заключен concluded договор contract о of проведении conduct работ , связанных work-related с with передачей transmission сведений Information особой special важности the importance of или or совсекретных sovsekretnyh сведений . Это довольно широкий круг лиц. of information. This is a pretty wide range of individuals. Например, провести зимний отпуск в Альпах теперь не смогут сотрудники банка, допущенные к сведениям о производстве продукции на предприятиях Роскосмоса. For example, spend winter holidays in the Alps now can not bank employees committed to information about the production process in enterprises Space Agency.

Единственная The only лазейка — здоровье . Если loophole – health. If в in период period отпуска holidays обладателю holder секретов Secrets нужно necessary лечение treatment за for рубежом Abroad и and аналогичных similar процедур procedures в in России Russia не not делают, do по on предписанию prescription врача doctor он he может can получить get разрешение resolution на on выезд . Это check-out. This единственное only исключение , предусмотренное the exception provided приказом Order Поповкина , никаких Popovkin, no других « иных Other “other случаев » в cases “in тексте text нет . no.

— – Это It служебный service документ , и document, and он he вписывается fits в in другие others действующие acting нормативные regulatory акты , касающиеся acts on вопросов issues обеспечения ensure секретности , — заявил « Известиям » руководитель Privacy – said “Izvestia” head пресс – службы Press – service Роскосмоса Russian Space Agency Алексей Alex Кузнецов . Kuznetsov.

Сам Himself Владимир Vladimir Поповкин Popovkin через through своего a пресс – секретаря Press – Secretary Анну Anna Ведищеву Vedischevu заявил « Известиям », что told “Izvestia”, which принятые adopted меры arrangements служат are не not запрету , а ban and упорядочению streamline выезда Check out за for рубеж frontier лиц , осведомленных persons knowledgeable о of секретных Secret сведениях . clues.

— Вопрос – Question о of том , почему why такие such меры arrangements не not принимались taken раньше, before, следует be адресовать address предыдущей previous администрации Administration Роскосмоса , — сказал он. Russian Space Agency, – he said.

В In подведомственных subordinate Роскосмосу Roscosmos предприятиях enterprises распоряжение disposal главы Chapter агентства Agency восприняли perceived без without энтузиазма . Невыездным of enthusiasm. restricted to travel abroad автоматически automatically становится is руководство guide всех all крупнейших the largest предприятий businesses и and холдингов holdings ракетно – космической Rocket – Space отрасли . Часто the industry. Often это it далеко far не not бедные poor люди , их people, their доходы revenue исчисляются calculated сотнями hundred тысяч thousands of долларов USD в in год . Обойти year. Getting Around новый new запрет ban им them будет will сложно , так difficult, because как as паспорта Passport сотрудников , обращающихся employees seeking с with секретами , полагается secrets, it is believed хранить store в in соответствующем appropriate отделе Department предприятия , где enterprises, where эти сотрудники работают . Выдаются these employees work. Issued паспорта Passport по on исполнении performance ряда number of формальностей, formalities и and бесконтрольно uncontrolled выехать leave за for рубеж frontier носитель carrier секретов Secrets не not сможет . can.

— – Наш Our руководитель manager имел had обыкновение habit в in январе January отдыхать rest на on островах Islands Индийского Indian океана , в Ocean, этом this году year он he был was на on Сейшелах , — рассказал « Известиям » собеседник Seychelles – told “Izvestia” interlocutor в in крупном large холдинге , выпускающем Holding, producing ракеты – носители missile – media тяжелого heavy класса . the class. — На – In следующий next год year у in него it другие others планы , но plans, but куда where конкретно specifically он he поедет , я go, I не not знаю . I know.

Заместитель Deputy директора Director крупной large организации organization Роскосмоса Russian Space Agency рассказал , что said that планирует plans получить get справку Help от from медика , подтверждающую physician confirming необходимость need выезда Check out за for рубеж : abroad:

— На – In следующей the next неделе week этим this и and займусь , потому loan, because что that летом in summer у in меня me в in последние last годы years график schedule не not позволяет . Мне allows it. I хочется want to в in тепло, heat и and зимой in winter в in России Russia мне me отдыхать rest негде . no place.

Сам Himself Владимир Vladimir Поповкин Popovkin в in августе August этого it года year проводил conducted отпуск vacation в in Сочи . Источник Sochi. Source в in Роскосмосе Roskosmos рассказывает , что says that руководитель manager не not впервые first адресует addresses отраслевым industry руководителям managers сигнал вести signal to более more скромный modest образ image жизни . Так , в of life. Thus, in начале early августа August этого it года year Роскосмос Roscosmos опубликовал published официальное official сообщение message о of намерении intention изменить change систему system оплаты Payment труда Labour отраслевых industry директоров Directors таким so образом , чтобы way that оклад salary руководителя Head превышал exceeded среднюю average зарплату Salary на on предприятии Company не not более more чем than в in пять five раз . Речь time. It идет is о of довольно rather существенном significant сокращении : в reduction: a этом this году year оклад salary руководителя Head превышает than заработную payroll плату fee работника employee в 8–10 раз . at 8-10.

We hazed at our high school, too (but nobody has died): Hazing death inquiry at Florida A&M: New incident, new investigation

Seven Billion People and Countless Other Beings to Talk About

What is Julia the Thanksgiving Girl or Jenn the rocket propulsion specialist doing right now?

What about John in the checkout line or Michelle in the deli at Publix?

Terrence or Mildred of Comcast, what does either one do on the weekend?

Or KK at Carson’s Grille?

Imagine a small fleet of crafts heading toward a distant habitable planet, sending and receiving reports along the journey, landing 1,000 years from now, funded by private individuals and companies on Earth that no longer exist in 3011.

What if government as we know it anywhere on Earth right now is no longer tenable in the near or distant future?

Would you trust the backers of a privately-funded, online voting or vote-matching system?

Shouldn’t our new system of cooperating with one another (what we commonly call politics or government) be more, not less, transparent?

Many business people are used to meeting in private, negotiating and signing nondisclosure agreements or other documents that prevent the average person on the street from seeing the details of average business transactions.

We call it competition, trade secrets, intellectual property and similar terms that ensure protection of privacy.

Government is that odd amalgam of public and private interfaces, where sole-source contracts and competing bids go up against marketing and advertisement campaigns.

If two ideas are competing against one another for limited resources, which of the ideas’ weak points or strengths is more important than the other’s?

I can talk about free, live, open source software (FLOSS) because there’s enough profitmaking available and excess resources for such a concept in small to medium markets.

What about on a global scale?

After all, a gaboodle of mobile phones contain Android, which contains a core, or kernel, of Linux code.

In our newly-connected global economy, which operates by and large as a supergossip network, where much of what we say to each other is superfluous but informational, we have created a citizenry that lives and loves outside the bounds of geographically-based political entities.

[Cue several paragraphs of historical comparisons to previous interconnected civilisations]

Are you interested in the status quo — government as it is and has been — or something new, something that develops from grassroot efforts, where we seamlessly become part of the Internet of Things, and transparency is commonplace but there’s room to respect the needs of profitmaking and intellectual/personal property rights?

I grew up playing board games called “Monopoly,” “Risk,” “Life,” and other cultural teaching tools centered on competition.  I didn’t play boards games that directly taught cooperation.  Instead, collusion of players ganging up on another was the indirect lesson I learned when one player was dominating and the others didn’t want that player to win.

It was in team sports and partner-based card games that I learned to cooperate with others in order to win against a respected opponent.

What are we teaching each other and our children about the future?

Take nothing for granted, granite included

If I knew that our solar system was packed with living things (at least in the way we choose to define the term “living”), would I feel as compelled as I do to encourage us to devote xx.xx% of our resources toward populating the cosmos with living things from Earth?

The WordPress front page displayed a link to a blog entry titled, “Off the Couch and Into the Streets.”  Rarely do I feel compelled to comment on a blog entry but I added one to Coleen’s:

Your blog entry popped up on the front page of WordPress, and the title “Off the couch and into the streets” caught my attention because I’m looking for a fun way to lose some extra weight. Thus, my expectations were different than you might have expected when you wrote this blog entry.

The Occupy [your locale] movement, Arab Spring, and any/all protestations against the common/established social structure are perennial, which usually fall under the label “counterculture.” I encourage you to feel and act differently, supporting your subcultural beliefs no matter how much you may feel crushed/oppressed by the common culture under which you live and socialise.

Having grown up during the 1960s global counterculture movement, my perspective, as a child at the tailend of the Baby Boomer generation, has taught and continues to teach me that those who protest will encourage others to act in less obvious, newsworthy manners, to effect longterm change.

I’m glad you have a job which gave you the flexibility and courage to join those who wanted to voice their displeasure with the current state of our common culture [one] day on the streets of Denver. Hopefully, through your job and with your friends, you can be the change you want to see today and into the future.

How do we express ourselves daily?  In other words, do we carefully consider the words we use in social exchanges?

Saying I am the “99%” or I am the “1%” or any other label automatically establishes an artificial barrier.

Reminds me of taking the Myers-Briggs personality profile test as a requirement of working in a certain department at a company full of a variety of personality types, including conformists and nonconformists.  After taking the test and, with another person who had gotten the same personality profile, saying that the test results were bogus, was informed that those who received that particular personality profile were prone to say the test results were bogus.

I feel the same way about the Occupy movement.  The participants brag about how diverse and unlabelable they are — yet, they quickly chant about the “99%” and the “1%” without blinking a self-conscious inner eye.

Another commenter said, “It’s like telling a child “You just like to argue” and the child keeps saying “Nuh uh!”.”  The same goes for those who are being labeled by the diverse Occupy movement participants.

To be frank, when I hear the Occupy movement chants through mass media soundbites, all I can think is, “Well, what if I’m one of the 1%?  So what?  Didn’t I earn my place in this financial position by saving (using the old adage of “pay yourself first”) and spending wisely?  Sure, some of my Nike shoes or my wife’s Kathy Lee Gifford designer clothes were made using kids paid ‘slave wages’ but I stopped buying those items after I found out about their manufacturing sources.  The University of Oregon and Stanford University, home to some students who have protested, didn’t refuse Phil Knight’s donations nor did the students refuse to attend those universities.  Regis Philbin, a person apparently beloved by many, didn’t stop being Kathy Lee Gifford’s friend.  I don’t have all the time in the world to investigate the raw material source and manufacturing location of every item I buy but will make reasonable changes when I find out.  Some parts of me are just as susceptible to instant gratification and buyer remorse as anyone else in the 1% or 99% (i.e., all seven billion of us).”

That’s why using or not using labels is important to me.  Also why I lump us all together into the label of “seven billion of us.”  We’re in this thing as one.  One planet, one global infrastructure, one solar ecosystem.

How do we train ourselves and one another to seek rewarding goals that limit destructive and detrimental effects on others, regardless of our entrenched differences?

This time of year, I look out the window and bare trees expose the view of row after row of shingled suburban rooftops.

The mortgage on my house has been paid off.  The majority of mortgages for the rooftops out there are probably still being paid for.

Shall I blame or thank the finance/banking industry for suburban sprawl that makes my skin crawl?

Shall I adjust my view to show myself the people occupying those suburban boxes are paying taxes that support the roads that allow me to drive to unoccupied parks and forests set aside for my enjoyment via local/state/national proclamation and financial support?

If, as one person said, the rich have enough money to pay for half the population to control/kill the other half, where does that put me?

Well, I know where it puts where I want to be.  I want to be one of the rich and when I get there, I don’t want to have to redistribute my wealth unnecessarily.  I admit I like having the total population of my species at my control.  I want to be Phil Knight and say, “Yeah, so what if my products have been made in sweat shops?  My personally-directed donations are creating a whole new crop of those who will rule from the top”.  If I’m going to be labeled as part of the 1%, I want to be Bill Gates, Carlos Slim, Pierre Omidyar or Vladimir Putin, not a homeless person as part of the poorest 1%.

Tiny leaves float through the air outside the window.  A woodpecker hops up and down tree limbs, presumably looking for hidden insects to munch upon.

Both public and private money has given me the time to sit here and make these comments.  It’ll take 100% of us to improve our conditions, if we so choose.

Yes, our global economy is not perfect and never will be perfect.  It displays characteristics of both an open and a closed-loop system, subject to the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Can we show how unselfish we are and share our wealth, of knowledge and financial gains, accordingly, while some of us compete against each other in the chess game of life to make things better for our descendants?

Live happily in the fact that today’s 1% will not be tomorrow’s 1% nor will today’s 99% be tomorrow’s.

If you don’t like what’s going on, take the opportunity to change it.  If you don’t like accumulating massive debt to pay for a college education, find a company that’ll hire you for your current skills/talents despite the lack of a diploma.  I did.  But I eventually got around to completing a bachelor’s degree just to prove I can (and got my company to foot the bill – hey, I wasn’t born yesterday – which set me up for a career ladder promotion that wasn’t interesting to me, but that’s another story).

Nothing is set in stone, except perhaps your date of death, and even that fades with time and exposure to the elements.

Think the members of the U.S. Congress who sit on a supercommittee can cut over $1T from the U.S. government budget and make everyone happy?  Wanna make a bet?

If it was me, I’d spread the cuts proportionally to those who are expected NOT to vote in the next election.  Hey, it’s only fair, is it not?  The U.S. is a democratic republic where lawful citizens have the right to participate in electing legislative, executive and some judicial representatives.  Those who choose not to participate, or vote, get less of the government pie to eat – isn’t that one of the tales we learned in kindergarten?

We’ll see what we see when the time comes…

The Middle Class, Buddha, “Office Plankton,” and Educationalism

Great commentary of the day, from last week, that is:

The middle class, as the Buddha, chose a middle path, skillfully maneuvering between conformism and prison

Писатель Александр Генис — о том, почему современный «офисный планктон» должен завидовать своим родителям Writer Alexander Genis – about why the modern “office plankton” should be jealous of their parents

The middle class, as the Buddha, chose a middle path, skillfully maneuvering between conformism and prisonАлександр Генис Alexander Genis

— Образованщина, — вынес профессор приговор целой эпохе, и вся аудитория привычно пригорюнилась. – Smatterers – Professor sentence handed down an entire era, and the entire audience accustomed prigoryunilas.

Одних участников этой конференции я знал давно, других — лично, третьих — по имени. Some participants in this conference, I knew a long time, others – in person, the third – by name. Тем удивительнее, с какой готовностью все эти незаурядные люди, собравшиеся в редакции толстого и уважаемого журнала, согласились перечеркнуть молодость и признать за своим поколением вину, которую на него взвалило обидное прозвище. More surprising how readily all these extraordinary people who gathered in the wording of the large and respected magazine, have agreed to cross the youth and to recognize the guilt of their generation, which hoisted him to embarrassing nickname.

По-моему, такое можно объяснить только одним: властью термина. In my opinion, this can only be explained by one thing: the power of the term. Я ощутил ее на себе, когда перебрался в Америку. I felt it on myself, when he moved to America. Живя в стране, которую мы не задумываясь называли социалистической, я пребывал в слепой уверенности, что за океаном меня ждет то же самое, только наоборот. Living in a country that we do not hesitate to call a socialist, I was in a blind belief that the ocean is waiting for me the same thing, only in reverse. В моем словаре антитеза родному режиму называлась одним словом — капитализм. In my dictionary the antithesis of the native mode is called in one word – capitalism. И я употреблял его с легкой душой и без задних мыслей, пока меня не остановил мой друг и редактор на «Радио Свобода». And I used it with a light heart and without ulterior motives, until I stopped by my friend and editor at the “Radio Freedom”.

— Разве ты марксист? – Are you a Marxist? — спросил он, добравшись в моем скрипте до полемического абзаца. – He asked, reaching into my script to polemical paragraph.

— Как ты мог подумать! – How could you think! — обиделся я. – I was offended.

— Почему же ты делишь мир так, как это удобно им, а не тебе? – Why did you delish world as it is convenient to them and not you?

Я не нашелся что ответить, но с тех пор никогда не позволяю чужому термину отобрать мою реальность. I do not know what to answer, but since then never allow a stranger to the term away my reality. А ведь именно это сделал Солженицын, когда брезгливо вычеркнул из соотечественников целый класс, который мы бы сейчас назвали «средним» — несмотря на все оговорки, которых требовала трудная история, сумасшедшая власть и нетривиальная экономика. And that is exactly what Solzhenitsyn did, when struck with disgust from fellow entire class, which we would now call “middle” – Despite all the reservations, which require a difficult story, a crazy non-trivial power and economy. Ведь ничего среднего в этом «среднем классе» не было — ни в доходах, ни в образовании, ни в интересах, ни в выпивке. Indeed, nothing in the middle “middle class” was not – neither the income nor education, nor in the interests of, or in drink. Как все тогда, он был соткан из крайностей, противоречий и отличался невоздержанностью. Like all the time, it was woven from the excesses, contradictions, and different intemperance. Бедность тут компенсировали любознательностью, свободу заменяли дружбой, политику — самиздатом, заграницу — байдаркой, все остальное — водкой. Poverty then compensated for curiosity, freedom replaced by friendship, politics – samizdat, abroad – kayak, all the rest – vodka.

По Солженицыну, образованщину составлял тот слой образованных людей, который не разделял его религиозные и национальные взгляды. According to Solzhenitsyn, was smatterers the layer of educated people, who did not share his religious and national views. По мне, в нее входили папа с мамой плюс все, с кем они дружили. For me, it included mum and dad, plus all those with whom they were friends. Иногда их называли аббревиатурой «ИТР», и в этом было много правды, потому что от «инженерно-технических работников» обычно требовалось меньше мерзости, чем от гуманитариев, а интересы у них были те же. Sometimes called the acronym “TDI”, and there was a lot of truth, because of the “engineers” are usually required less filth than from the humanities, and the interests they were the same.

Сейчас уже забыли, а может, и не знали, что всему хорошему обычная советская жизнь обязана не властям и не диссидентам, а именно и только «образованщине». It is now forgotten, and maybe did not know what all the good normal life must not the Soviet authorities and the dissidents, but it is only “educationalism.” Они были подписчиками толстых журналов, в которых тлела общественная мысль. They have been subscribed literary journals, which smoldered social thought. Они знали наизусть все песни Окуджавы. They knew by heart all the songs of Okudzhava. Они боготворили Тарковского и понимали Феллини. They worshiped Tarkovsky and Fellini understood. Они раскупали миллионы умных книг. They bought up millions of smart books. Они придумывали анекдоты и шутили в КВН. They came up with anecdotes and jokes in the WHC. Они стояли ночами за билетами на Таганку. They stood there at night to get tickets to Taganka. Они распространяли самиздат, включая ту самую статью Солженицына, где их обвиняли в космополитизме, атеизме, трусости и бездуховности. They distributed samizdat, including the very same article by Solzhenitsyn, where they were accused of cosmopolitanism, atheism, cowardice, and lack of spirituality.

Сейчас кажется, что все это — пустяки, но тогда они ими не были. Now it seems that all of this – nothing, but then they do not have them. Средний класс, как Будда, выбирал средний путь, умело лавируя между конформизмом и тюрьмой. The middle class, as the Buddha, chose a middle path, skillfully maneuvering between conformism and a prison. Такой образ жизни требовал ума, жертв и совести. This way of life demanded of mind and conscience of the victims. Например, делать карьеру и избегать подлости. For example, a career and to avoid infamy. Отличать своих и терпеть чужих. Distinguish their own and other people suffer. Боготворить культуру и верить в ее искупительную силу. Worship culture and believe in its redemptive power.

В том мире многого не хватало — выборов, парламента, заграничного паспорта и всегда денег. In the world many things are not enough – the elections, parliament, passport and money always. Но было и много лишнего, больше всего — просвещения. But there was a lot of nonsense, most of all – education. Первый томик Мандельштама я обменял на двухнедельную зарплату пожарного — дороже стихов не бывает. The first volume of Mandelstam I traded in two week’s wages of fire – more poetry does not happen. Уже в Америке я познакомился с дамой, которая на пару с «Эрикой» заменила печатный станок. Even in America, I met a lady who for a couple of the “Erika” has replaced the printing press. Только «Собачье сердце» она перепечатала 200 раз. Only the “Heart of a Dog,” she reprinted 200 times.

Время «образованщины», как, собственно, и предсказывал Солженицын, кончилось. Time “educationalism” as, indeed, predicted Solzhenitsyn ended. Скептики полагают, что ее заменил «офисный планктон» — с узкими интересами и широкими возможностями. Skeptics believe that it replaced the “office plankton” – with narrow interests and great potential. Мне говорят, что они осторожны, потому что им есть что терять. I say they are careful because they have something to lose. Они не любознательны, потому что уже все видели. They are not curious, because I already saw everything. Они не рвутся за колею, потому что обходятся комфортом. They do not rush for the track, because the cost comfort.

Возможно, это и так, но я не берусь судить, чтобы не повторять прежних ошибок. Maybe so, but I do not presume to judge, not to repeat past mistakes. Мы не видим достижений своего времени, ибо их заслоняют его более наглядные пороки. We do not see the achievements of his time, because they hide it more obvious flaws.

У тех, кто живет сегодня, другой набор ценностей. For those who live today, a different set of values. Их труднее удивить и проще разочаровать. They are harder to surprise and disappoint easier. Они уже не живут на кухне, меньше пьют, не боятся границ, знают языки и ценят свободу, хотя бы виртуальную. They no longer live in the kitchen, drink less, are not afraid of borders, languages ​​and know the value freedom, even if virtual. Они слишком сильно отличаются от своих родителей, чтобы их понимать, не говоря уже — завидовать. They are too different from their parents to understand them, not to mention – envy. И все же каждый раз, когда заходит речь о том, что надежда любой страны — ее средний класс, стоит вспомнить, что он был и тогда, когда его назвали «образованщиной» и считали ошибкой. And yet every time it comes to that hope of any country – its middle class, it is worth remembering that it was and when it was called “educationalism” and considered an error.

Has the fog burned off yet?

A list of books piles higher in the house.

Piles of books rise higher, the reader reluctant to dive in during the warm summer months, content to lie down on the sofa in the sunroom, watch the world go by, snooze, check Nothing off the daily to-do list one more time.

So a book had to be moved into the bathroom to be read.

The writer – Geerat Vermeij.  The story – his life story, the story of a boy blinded by disease as a toddler and going on to become a successful scientist.

Other stories he has told: one explanation of the diversity in ocean systems, for instance.

Adaptation, competition, genetic drift, specialisation – more words with multiple meanings in our continuing conversation as the proverbial blind people standing in one place describing a single aspect/feature of an elephant.

However, we tend to wander around, observe from multiple locations, regardless of physical abilities.

I had vivid dreams last night, sparked by a challenge to myself to give the widest diversity of input to the supercomputer, network of hackers and business associates so they can help figure out what is wrong with the idea that our current economic problems can be solved by motivating people to consume more and take on debt in order to motivate them to work and pay off the debt, preferably revolving debt while consuming/buying more and more and more and more.

What if the produce/consume model is wrong, regardless of its implementation in societies that are primarily capitalistic or primarily communistic?

Setting aside religious objections to the model of life as evolutionary biology, what is the next revolution in the evolution of our born/eat/reproduce/sleep/die social interaction set?

While the BRICS presumably builds upon the old middle class stabilisation model, what can the EUSA do to establish a more successful model of sustainable species growth?

Do we throw out everything and start over; that is, foment revolution on a massive scale, disrupting the global economy to create something we hope, from our angle that only includes a detailed analysis of the past and a limited view of the future, is better in the longterm?

Or is it only a matter of shifting perceptions?

What was once, in this country, a democratic republic that partially regulated the capitalistic economic system, becomes a democratic republic that is controlled by a centrally planned capitalistic economic system?

In other words, people can still vote for legislators to write laws about our social behaviours, creating rewards and punishments for how we treat one another as individuals or perceived members of groups.   We separate the management of our economy from the government, voting with our money for the companies led and/or owned by those who dedicate themselves to plan the best allocation of resources – raw material, land, people.

What is the effect on an economy/society if more public roads became private toll roads?

What is the effect on an economy/society if other public services – schools, common defense (police/military), firefighting, social safety net (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food assistance) – become privately managed, meaning you have to directly pay and/or work for the service(s)?

How do we promote love and compassion instead of selfish greed, hoarding and fear?

How do we provide a sense of stability rather than prey on insecurities?

With seven billion different behaviour sets (and growing), how many different ways must we describe the new tools we’ve created to ensure everyone understands we can have access to adequate sustenance, if we want it.

And if we or you don’t want it, that’s okay.  No system or systems will accommodate every want and need, no matter how inclusive it may try to be.

More later – the analysts who run the supercomputer are ready for input, the hackers have found a way to tap into more computer systems to increase the supercomputer’s virtual processing power, and my business associates…well, I can’t talk about what they want me to talk with them about right now.

The Door: Chapter Opens Minds

He mesmerized us with his worlds, taking us from our seats to the twilight zone, the constantly lighted sky of the Arctic Circle in June. “Cold,” he said, and we shivered. “You can read a newspaper outside at midnight,” he said and we saw a headline, a photo of an Eskimo with the caption, ‘Reading the paper at midnight,’ bordered by advertisements for automobiles and contact lenses.

I stopped, stepping out of his world and looked down at the paper I had been scribbling on. Symbols, hieroglyphics of an age in which I was poorly suited, tried to convey their meanings, calling to me in their siren-trained voices, pulling with invisible strings, wanting me to serve them and project them upon others.

A voice behind me halted the mesmerizer’s world. The voice, a mix of noises that sounded like “the Earth-Sun relationship,” plucked a chord in the mesmerizer’s tongue which resounded, “I’m paid to teach. I’ll give the answers.” These sounds confused me, for last I knew, I had camped out on the ice and looked in wonder at the northern lights. Had the mesmerizer lost his way? Would we get back to safety?

His voice pinpointed our last location and we packed up our things, readying ourselves for the next disaster, a dissenting voice or blatant yawn, and headed for the door.

What lay beyond. He had not said. No voice or written symbol disclosed the secrets past that door. How would we know what to take with us to secure our passage, to guarantee an open path, to ensure our safe return? Who could we ask to help us?

We could not stay inside forever. Someone would have to go and get more food soon. Our supplies were limited. And what about the news of others? How would we keep in contact to know when they might need our help?

We were caught in a dilemma, our mesmerizer helpless to this task, unable to come up with messages of promise except to say he’d been there and back; we would not know until we “crossed that threshold,” he tried to say, in vain, having lost the hold with which he got us here.

We looked about us, avoiding any eye contact that might betray the fear that we were lost. We saw the door. We memorized its golden shape, three feet wide and five feet high, a wooden hunk carved from trees that sheltered other creatures in the past, momentarily lost, tarrying beneath the swaying boughs, contemplating whether the sky would fall.

Inside or outside the door, our hope for security was thinning, for if the sky were to fall, we’d die no matter where we stood. But who had said the sky would fall? We could not tell. The floor was littered with walking sounds that jumped up and spoke into our ears, spreading stories and giving out lies like mudcake pies to children who thought they’d gotten pastries filled with sugar, honey, peaches and apples. The northern lights had not yet moved, held in place by the commanding voice of our mesmerizer. Why, then, would the sky fall? One walking sound had told us that, past the door, the mesmerizer lost his voice.

He had not flatly denied the charge, having forgotten to test his voice when he had “been there and back,” out past the door. His stupidity would end us! How could he have forgotten? Wasn’t his voice needed outside the door as well as in here? He tried to calm us, telling us that others did the mesmerizing “out there.” He had not spoken because he, like us, had been mesmerized and feared to speak lest the sky should fall.

He did not pacify our fear. He, too, feared the sky and had held us in his sway. If we thought he held the sky up and he did not…we were perplexed.

“Who hold the sky up?” one dared to speak out loud, the one who’d blurted out that unknown phrase, “the Earth-Sun relationship.” Our eyes flashed wide in unison, like a field of poppies, spreading seed of doubt in the wind. Were we to let this blasphemous one remain among us to choke our lives with unwanted weeds and flowers? How long before others would give way to the questioning thoughts of this lost one and begin to doubt the right of our mesmerizer to hold up the sky?

Our mesmerizer spoke. “You must understand, the sky does not fall. It cannot fall.”

“It cannot fall?” Had he gone made? We looked at each other, no longer afraid to show the fear within our eyes. Did he not know, we told each other, the very words he’d taught us, the symbols he’d shown us in the Books? What of the gods Galileo and Newton, Einstein and Copernicus? Had not they held up the sky with their messianic symbols; had not Freud and Adler and Laing explained to all of us how they, the gods, worked and that we were imperfect copies? Was our mesmerizer telling us that we are not copies but frauds?

Perhaps he’d made a mistake which we copies were prone to do. We must not forget those immortal words of a god long ago — “To err is human, to forgive divine.” We knew that mesmerizers were built like us but given the charge to hold up the sky and teach us to emulate the gods. They mesmerized us with their worlds, taking us to the land of the gods, a place and time where humans did not exist.

Our mesmerizer turned his attention from us to look at the device on his wrist, a gift from the gods that he along knew how to interpret.

“Well, class is up. I guess I’ll see you guys again tomorrow. Don’t forget to do your homework.” He spoke the magic words and we walked confidently out the door.