First of all, a big “Thanks!” to Terry at the AT&T landline phone repair group.
Although Trish and Trina of AT&T weekend support had great phone voices when I talked to them about my home landline having problems, they simply saw (presumably on computer screens) a report that my landline was fine, which they courteously reported back to me on the AT&T mobile phone I used to report unacceptable issues with my AT&T landline.
Unfortunately, friendly as they were, it did not solve the landline problems of strange pops, clicks, hums and, intermittently, no dial tone and/or no ADSL service.
Terry drove 35-40 miles across town yesterday and investigated the problem.
It appears, from his description, that a bad card in the box down by the highway (a DSLAM, perhaps?) was the source. In any case, he swapped the landline connection to a different port and Voila! service as clear as a bell (Ma Bell to the rescue) and quiet as a mouse (no squeaks, though) are the lack of sounds I like to hear.
Terry, you’re my wife’s Hometown Hero of the Day!
Many more to thank, but on to other matters, next…
What does it take to make you happy?
In a network of seven billion people, how many do you know who do not seek material wealth or social/public accolades, finding, instead, a deep sense of self-worth and self-satisfaction by simply living in the moment, irregardless of current circumstances?
When you tell a species, that has developed a way to externalise the internal imagery a central nervous system has nurtured through social and self education, to let loose on an individual basis, putting social conforming norms aside, what do you get?
Does the species create a new thought process that makes former definitions of success irrelevant?
What about those who still seek the old ways of defining glory?
What about subcultures that depend upon forceful means for maintaining their existence?
Some will defend their subcultures to the death.
Some will accept/believe that enough people in their subculture want to perpetuate their peaceful means/way that they feel no need to defend themselves, accepting newcomers with differing beliefs into their lives, letting their day-to-day activities, rather than words or force, serve as examples.
In fact, our personality traits define the subcultural practices to which we best belong or toward which we tend to gravitate.
We do not choose the influences upon us during our formative years.
For a few years, we are nearly helpless, defenseless, and then, as we become aware of our individual strengths/weaknesses, we not only react to our environment, we proactively shape our environment.
As a child, I was raised primarily in a suburban environment.
When I was strong enough and tall enough, my father placed me behind a lawnmower and told me to get to work.
Eventually, I performed the lawnmowing duties for my neighbours, pricing my work according to the financial means I perceived — the elderly, retired lady next door paid me a few dollars but I was more grateful for the glass of fresh, cold lemonade or iced tea she made me than the money — I was taught that mowing was not just a job but a form of social duty.
Every dollar I earned was one less dollar my parents felt obligated, up to a point, to provide me to maintain the lifestyle of a suburban teenager who liked to walk to the store and buy a candy bar, one or two bottles of soda, a pack of chewing gum and a comic book, sharing them with my friends who got their money in ways I never thought to ask.
Meanwhile, national governments motivated military troops to maneuver into position in official war zones to protect and define the lines that divided major lifestyles because the idea of global economic trade had not been fully fleshed out yet.
That was then, this is now.
Kids still mow lawns, with girls as likely to stand behind the self-propelled mower as boys. Just as common are professional lawncare service companies that sweep through neighbourhoods, mowing grass, trimming hedges, planting flowers and rearranging topiary animal displays.
Enough profit is generated by our modern global economy to free up millions of people from work, and thus their social duty, if they don’t want to.
“Free up?”
We still have to breathe, eat and sleep so we are not free from our bodily needs, no matter how financial and mentally secure we may be.
We are free to exercise our imaginations.
More and more often, we are free to express our imaginations publicly.
In a global economy, what is the connection between the general culture where global economic activity takes places and the subcultures that were once isolated from each other when warzones were acceptable means of controlling subcultural interaction?
A popular term right now is “Internet censorship.”
Every subculture has terms and ideas that are taboo.
Hate crimes, deity insults, unapproved bombings/killings, unsanctioned robbery/theft…
We redefine our actions in accordance with subcultural rules.
Behind every wall is a person who doesn’t want to be there for one reason or another, if only for a brief moment.
The grass is always greener on the other side.
Many rules/laws define my existence at this moment — grammar rules, computer operating system rules, the law of gravity, the local/state/national/global rules/laws that govern my ability to communicate across an interplanetary electronic network…
I see friends and acquaintances come and go as Internet firewalls are loosened/strengthened because of the perception that governments feel the need to protect subcultural taboos, defending their lifestyles, including mine.
All of the actions of my species I take into account as I look back at us 1000 years from now, seeing how we became who we will be (or are, depending on perspective).
Once colonies become independent, like children, they redefine their ideas of self, sometimes maintaining previous definitions and sometimes stretching their imaginations toward something we can’t imagine today.
One day, we see the visible light and invisible energy of galaxies as the foam on the sea of the universe, and the next day, we declare that perhaps the galaxies are all there is out there — mathematical formulae created imaginatively and then tested against observation.
Either way, we’re still a superset of states of energy that calls itself a species that depends on other species that live on/in us to give us the freedom to say we’ve reached the state of self-actualisation, happy to do whatever makes us happy in the moment, socially connected/defined or purposefully isolated individually.
Or, for some, a happy moment in the future we believe will exist for us, if we just work harder/smarter for ourselves and/or for the social good/[sub]culture to which we say/believe we belong.